Crumbling Forests and the Baka: An Anthropological Insight into Forest Conservation in Cameroon’s South Eastern Region

F. Titang
{"title":"Crumbling Forests and the Baka: An Anthropological Insight into Forest Conservation in Cameroon’s South Eastern Region","authors":"F. Titang","doi":"10.20431/2454-8677.0501007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade or so, international conventions on climate change, biodiversity have increasingly dominated the international sustainable development agenda. The global policy shift from the Millennium Development Goals (MDG‘s) at the end of its tenure in 2015 to the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals (as set by the United Nations following consultations on the Post 2015 Development Agenda), clearly established the need for renewed thinking and alternative paradigms in development cooperation to ensure environmental stability and sustainability. The term ―green conditionality‖ has become the driving force for so called ―green institutions‖ towards ensuring sustainable development, as states rush to meet up with environmental protection measures. However, the spectacle of conservation to guarantee human well being and safe guard natural habitats relied on the premise that man and his environment are one in a whole. The fundamental thinking underlying the discourse propagated by international environment agencies and organizations is axed on the argument that it is in man‘s own interest to diminish and or placate actions that seemingly contribute towards global environmental deterioration 1 . Regrettably, this had been impaired by the controversies surrounding discourses on environmental sustainability, the major point of contention being the destructive influence of man‘s actions on the ecosystem. As exhaustively argued in The Lie of the Land (Leach & Mearns, 1996), the foundations of science and policy discourse regarding environmental sustainability and protection has operationalized environmental sustainability actions as ―received wisdom‖, justifying the need for the West and environmental conservation agencies to take concerted actions to save the planet from man‘s destructive influence.","PeriodicalId":388728,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology","volume":"270 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-8677.0501007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade or so, international conventions on climate change, biodiversity have increasingly dominated the international sustainable development agenda. The global policy shift from the Millennium Development Goals (MDG‘s) at the end of its tenure in 2015 to the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals (as set by the United Nations following consultations on the Post 2015 Development Agenda), clearly established the need for renewed thinking and alternative paradigms in development cooperation to ensure environmental stability and sustainability. The term ―green conditionality‖ has become the driving force for so called ―green institutions‖ towards ensuring sustainable development, as states rush to meet up with environmental protection measures. However, the spectacle of conservation to guarantee human well being and safe guard natural habitats relied on the premise that man and his environment are one in a whole. The fundamental thinking underlying the discourse propagated by international environment agencies and organizations is axed on the argument that it is in man‘s own interest to diminish and or placate actions that seemingly contribute towards global environmental deterioration 1 . Regrettably, this had been impaired by the controversies surrounding discourses on environmental sustainability, the major point of contention being the destructive influence of man‘s actions on the ecosystem. As exhaustively argued in The Lie of the Land (Leach & Mearns, 1996), the foundations of science and policy discourse regarding environmental sustainability and protection has operationalized environmental sustainability actions as ―received wisdom‖, justifying the need for the West and environmental conservation agencies to take concerted actions to save the planet from man‘s destructive influence.
破碎的森林和巴卡:对喀麦隆东南地区森林保护的人类学见解
近十年来,气候变化、生物多样性等国际公约日益成为国际可持续发展议程的重要议题。从2015年任期结束时的千年发展目标到通过可持续发展目标(由联合国在2015年后发展议程磋商后确定)的全球政策转变,明确确立了在发展合作方面需要更新思维和替代范式,以确保环境稳定和可持续性。“绿色条件性”一词已成为确保可持续发展的所谓“绿色制度”的推动力,因为各国都急于采取环保措施。然而,保障人类福祉和安全保护自然栖息地的保护景观依赖于人与环境是一个整体的前提。国际环境机构和组织宣传的话语背后的基本思想是基于这样一种观点:减少或缓和看似会导致全球环境恶化的行为符合人类自身的利益。令人遗憾的是,围绕环境可持续性论述的争论削弱了这一点,争论的主要焦点是人类行为对生态系统的破坏性影响。正如《土地的谎言》(Leach & meanns, 1996)中详尽论述的那样,关于环境可持续性和保护的科学和政策话语的基础已经将环境可持续性行动作为“公认的智慧”来运作,证明西方和环境保护机构需要采取协调一致的行动来拯救地球免受人类的破坏性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信