Social Policy Reforms and Economic Distances in China

Q. Gao, Sui Yang, Fuhua Zhai, Yake Wang
{"title":"Social Policy Reforms and Economic Distances in China","authors":"Q. Gao, Sui Yang, Fuhua Zhai, Yake Wang","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190077938.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using CHIP data for 2002, 2007, and 2013, this chapter examines the effects of social policy reforms on the economic distance between rich and poor households in the urban, rural, and migrant sectors. In the urban sector, pensions consistently narrowed economic distances, whereas other social benefits—health insurance, social assistance, supplementary income, and in-kind benefits—had little redistributive impact. Social benefits in both the rural and migrant sectors changed from being regressive in 2002 to becoming progressive in 2013. In the rural areas, benefits in 2013 from agricultural and livelihood subsidies played the most significant redistributive role; private transfers also narrowed economic distances. Among migrants in 2013, health benefits and taxes and fees narrowed economic distances, although less so than among rural residents. Despite the expansion of social policies during this period, in both urban and rural China market forces trumped the redistributive effects of the social benefits.","PeriodicalId":141022,"journal":{"name":"Changing Trends in China's Inequality","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing Trends in China's Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190077938.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using CHIP data for 2002, 2007, and 2013, this chapter examines the effects of social policy reforms on the economic distance between rich and poor households in the urban, rural, and migrant sectors. In the urban sector, pensions consistently narrowed economic distances, whereas other social benefits—health insurance, social assistance, supplementary income, and in-kind benefits—had little redistributive impact. Social benefits in both the rural and migrant sectors changed from being regressive in 2002 to becoming progressive in 2013. In the rural areas, benefits in 2013 from agricultural and livelihood subsidies played the most significant redistributive role; private transfers also narrowed economic distances. Among migrants in 2013, health benefits and taxes and fees narrowed economic distances, although less so than among rural residents. Despite the expansion of social policies during this period, in both urban and rural China market forces trumped the redistributive effects of the social benefits.
中国的社会政策改革与经济距离
本章利用2002年、2007年和2013年的CHIP数据,考察了社会政策改革对城市、农村和流动人口部门的贫富家庭之间经济距离的影响。在城市部门,养老金不断缩小经济差距,而其他社会福利——医疗保险、社会救助、补充收入和实物福利——对再分配几乎没有影响。农村和外来务工人员的社会福利从2002年的退步到2013年的进步性转变。在农村地区,2013年农业补贴和生活补贴的再分配作用最为显著;私人转移也拉近了经济距离。2013年,在流动人口中,医疗福利和税费拉近了经济距离,尽管这一点在农村居民中没有那么明显。尽管这一时期的社会政策有所扩张,但在中国的城市和农村,市场力量都胜过了社会福利的再分配效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信