Association between risk disclosure and (in) existence of corporate reputation of publicly traded companies in Brazil

Beatriz Alves dos Santos, A. J. R. Maia, A. Vasconcelos
{"title":"Association between risk disclosure and (in) existence of corporate reputation of publicly traded companies in Brazil","authors":"Beatriz Alves dos Santos, A. J. R. Maia, A. Vasconcelos","doi":"10.5902/1983465969083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - To analyze the possible association between non-financial risk disclosure and the (in) existence of reputation in the most prominent Brazilian publicly traded companies considering the legitimacy theory.\nDesign/methodology/approach - The sample assembles 118 corporations listed on B3 and 345 reference forms from 2006 to 2018. In the analysis of corporate reputation, the presence or absence on ISE and, or ICO2 from B3 was considered. For non-financial risk disclosure, a factor checklist containing 31 risks was taken, categorized under operational, damage, integrity, and strategic risks, from the analysis of Reference Forms. A tree regression, a multiple correspondence analysis, and a T-test of the difference between means were used for data analysis.\nFindings - There is scientific evidence that the companies with reputations demonstrate non-financial risk disclosure superior to the others. This behavior is confirmed in the subcategories of integrity and strategic risks. Moreover, risk factors in the subcategory of integrity risks were crucial to non-financial risk disclosure.\nOriginality/value - This research paves the way to deepen the early debate surrounding risk disclosure and corporate reputation, especially regarding the quality of non-financial risk disclosure.","PeriodicalId":197586,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administração da UFSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465969083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - To analyze the possible association between non-financial risk disclosure and the (in) existence of reputation in the most prominent Brazilian publicly traded companies considering the legitimacy theory. Design/methodology/approach - The sample assembles 118 corporations listed on B3 and 345 reference forms from 2006 to 2018. In the analysis of corporate reputation, the presence or absence on ISE and, or ICO2 from B3 was considered. For non-financial risk disclosure, a factor checklist containing 31 risks was taken, categorized under operational, damage, integrity, and strategic risks, from the analysis of Reference Forms. A tree regression, a multiple correspondence analysis, and a T-test of the difference between means were used for data analysis. Findings - There is scientific evidence that the companies with reputations demonstrate non-financial risk disclosure superior to the others. This behavior is confirmed in the subcategories of integrity and strategic risks. Moreover, risk factors in the subcategory of integrity risks were crucial to non-financial risk disclosure. Originality/value - This research paves the way to deepen the early debate surrounding risk disclosure and corporate reputation, especially regarding the quality of non-financial risk disclosure.
风险披露与巴西上市公司存在的企业声誉之间的关系
目的-考虑合法性理论,分析巴西最著名的上市公司的非财务风险披露与存在的声誉之间可能存在的关联。设计/方法/方法-样本包括2006年至2018年在B3和345份参考表格中列出的118家公司。在企业声誉分析中,考虑了ISE和B3中ICO2的存在与否。对于非财务风险披露,采用了包含31个风险的因素清单,根据参考表格的分析,将其分类为操作风险、损害风险、完整性风险和战略风险。数据分析采用树回归、多重对应分析和均数差异的t检验。研究结果-有科学证据表明,声誉良好的公司在非财务风险披露方面优于其他公司。这种行为在完整性和战略风险的子类别中得到证实。此外,诚信风险子类别中的风险因素对非财务风险披露至关重要。原创性/价值-这项研究为深化早期围绕风险披露和企业声誉的辩论铺平了道路,特别是关于非财务风险披露的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信