AN EVALUATION OF HEALTH LITERACY SITUATIONS OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

F. Aslantekin, Mesude Uluşen, B. Kaplan, M. Uysal
{"title":"AN EVALUATION OF HEALTH LITERACY SITUATIONS OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES","authors":"F. Aslantekin, Mesude Uluşen, B. Kaplan, M. Uysal","doi":"10.12816/0001499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To analyze factors which effect diabetes health literacy (DHL) situations of patients with type 2 diabetes and their relations with sociodemographic variables. Data were collected in a policlinic of a public hospital between 1 and 30 December 2010 through questionnaires from patients with type 2 diabetes who were older than 18 years and accepted to be interviewed. For each correct answer related to DHL situations, the variable was given 1 point and for others, 0 point was given. Thus, a scoring was made to evaluate DHL levels. 62,2% of participants were women, 81,4% were over 44, 23,8% were illiterate, 53,3% were unemployed, 32% had a monthly income equal to or below 700 TL. It was found that 38,8% of participants had difficulties in reading and writing skills. 61,1% of participants had type 2 diabetes for five years and longer, 21,5% did not show up regularly for control, 71,7% never attended educational meetings for diabetes, 93,5% did not know their HbA1c values, 16,9% changed potions without asking their doctors, and 33,9% wrongly interpreted usage instruction sample (3×1 drug use). There was a significant difference between participants’ DHL scores and education status (p˂0,001). DHL averages of patients whose duration of illness was 5 to 14 years were significantly higher than those whose duration of illness was less than 4 years or more than 15 years (p=0,036). Estimated relative risk in regression model of being high in comparison to those having difficulty in at least one of reading or writing activities was 2,697 (95%GA: 1,208-6,022). The estimated relative risk of being high for DHL scores of those, whose duration of illness was 15 and more years, was equal to 5,437 (95%GA: 1,798-16,436) in comparison to patients who had been diseased for 4 or fewer years. Factors such as education, reading and writing skills, area of settlement, and family support which have all been found to affect DHL scores should be given due attention in treatments of patients with type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":351803,"journal":{"name":"medical journal of islamic world academy of sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medical journal of islamic world academy of sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0001499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To analyze factors which effect diabetes health literacy (DHL) situations of patients with type 2 diabetes and their relations with sociodemographic variables. Data were collected in a policlinic of a public hospital between 1 and 30 December 2010 through questionnaires from patients with type 2 diabetes who were older than 18 years and accepted to be interviewed. For each correct answer related to DHL situations, the variable was given 1 point and for others, 0 point was given. Thus, a scoring was made to evaluate DHL levels. 62,2% of participants were women, 81,4% were over 44, 23,8% were illiterate, 53,3% were unemployed, 32% had a monthly income equal to or below 700 TL. It was found that 38,8% of participants had difficulties in reading and writing skills. 61,1% of participants had type 2 diabetes for five years and longer, 21,5% did not show up regularly for control, 71,7% never attended educational meetings for diabetes, 93,5% did not know their HbA1c values, 16,9% changed potions without asking their doctors, and 33,9% wrongly interpreted usage instruction sample (3×1 drug use). There was a significant difference between participants’ DHL scores and education status (p˂0,001). DHL averages of patients whose duration of illness was 5 to 14 years were significantly higher than those whose duration of illness was less than 4 years or more than 15 years (p=0,036). Estimated relative risk in regression model of being high in comparison to those having difficulty in at least one of reading or writing activities was 2,697 (95%GA: 1,208-6,022). The estimated relative risk of being high for DHL scores of those, whose duration of illness was 15 and more years, was equal to 5,437 (95%GA: 1,798-16,436) in comparison to patients who had been diseased for 4 or fewer years. Factors such as education, reading and writing skills, area of settlement, and family support which have all been found to affect DHL scores should be given due attention in treatments of patients with type 2 diabetes.
2型糖尿病患者健康素养状况评价
分析2型糖尿病患者糖尿病健康素养状况的影响因素及其与社会人口学变量的关系。数据于2010年12月1日至30日在一家公立医院的门诊收集,通过对18岁以上接受访谈的2型糖尿病患者进行问卷调查。对于与DHL情况相关的每一个正确答案,该变量加1分,对于其他的,加0分。因此,一个评分来评估DHL水平。62,2%的参与者是女性,81,4%的人超过44,23,8 %是文盲,53,3%的人失业,32%的月收入等于或低于700 TL。研究发现,38,8%的参与者在阅读和写作技能方面有困难。61.1%的参与者患有2型糖尿病5年及以上,21.5%的参与者没有定期出现作为对照,71.7%的参与者从未参加过糖尿病教育会议,93.5%的参与者不知道自己的HbA1c值,16.9%的参与者在没有询问医生的情况下更换了药水,33.9%的参与者错误地解释了使用说明样本(3×1药物使用)。参与者的DHL分数和受教育程度之间存在显著差异(p小于0.001)。病程5 ~ 14年的患者DHL平均值显著高于病程小于4年或大于15年的患者(p= 0.036)。在回归模型中,与在至少一项阅读或写作活动中有困难的人相比,高的相对风险估计为2,697 (95%GA: 1,208-6,022)。与患病时间不超过4年的患者相比,患病时间在15年及以上的患者DHL评分较高的估计相对风险为5,437 (95%GA: 1,798-16,436)。在2型糖尿病患者的治疗中,教育程度、读写能力、居住区域、家庭支持等因素均对DHL评分有影响,应予以重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信