An Exploratory Evaluation of a Collaboration Feedback Report

Vanessa Echeverría, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, X. Ochoa, K. Chiluiza
{"title":"An Exploratory Evaluation of a Collaboration Feedback Report","authors":"Vanessa Echeverría, Marisol Wong-Villacrés, X. Ochoa, K. Chiluiza","doi":"10.1145/3506860.3506890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing formative feedback to foster collaboration and improve students’ practice has been an emerging topic in CSCL and LA research communities. However, this pedagogical practice could be unrealistic in authentic classrooms, as observing and annotating improvements for every student and group exceeds the teacher’s capabilities. In the research area of group work and collaborative learning, current learning analytics solutions have reported accurate computational models to understand collaboration processes, yet evaluating formative collaboration feedback, where the final user is the student, is an under-explored research area. This paper reports an exploratory evaluation to understand the effects a collaboration feedback report through an authentic study conducted in regular classes. Fifty students from a Computer Science undergraduate program participated in the study. We followed an user-centered design approach to define six collaboration aspects that are relevant to students. These aspects were part of initial prototypes for the feedback report. From the exploratory intervention, we did not find effects between students who received the feedback (experimental condition) report and those who did not (control condition). Finally, this paper discusses design implications for further feedback report designs and interventions.","PeriodicalId":185465,"journal":{"name":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Providing formative feedback to foster collaboration and improve students’ practice has been an emerging topic in CSCL and LA research communities. However, this pedagogical practice could be unrealistic in authentic classrooms, as observing and annotating improvements for every student and group exceeds the teacher’s capabilities. In the research area of group work and collaborative learning, current learning analytics solutions have reported accurate computational models to understand collaboration processes, yet evaluating formative collaboration feedback, where the final user is the student, is an under-explored research area. This paper reports an exploratory evaluation to understand the effects a collaboration feedback report through an authentic study conducted in regular classes. Fifty students from a Computer Science undergraduate program participated in the study. We followed an user-centered design approach to define six collaboration aspects that are relevant to students. These aspects were part of initial prototypes for the feedback report. From the exploratory intervention, we did not find effects between students who received the feedback (experimental condition) report and those who did not (control condition). Finally, this paper discusses design implications for further feedback report designs and interventions.
协作反馈报告的探索性评估
在CSCL和LA研究社区中,提供形成性反馈以促进合作和改善学生的实践已经成为一个新兴的话题。然而,这种教学实践在真实的课堂中可能是不现实的,因为观察和注释每个学生和小组的进步超出了教师的能力。在小组工作和协作学习的研究领域,目前的学习分析解决方案已经报告了精确的计算模型来理解协作过程,然而评估形成性协作反馈(最终用户是学生)是一个尚未开发的研究领域。本文报告了一项探索性评估,通过在常规课堂上进行的真实研究来了解协作反馈报告的效果。来自计算机科学本科专业的50名学生参与了这项研究。我们遵循以用户为中心的设计方法来定义与学生相关的六个协作方面。这些方面是反馈报告的初始原型的一部分。从探索性干预中,我们没有发现收到反馈(实验条件)报告的学生和没有收到反馈(控制条件)报告的学生之间的影响。最后,本文讨论了进一步反馈报告设计和干预的设计含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信