The Performance Evaluation of Nine Methods for the Estimation of Weibull Distribution Parameters

S. Lukman, Saulawa B Sani, M. Asani, S. Ojo, Adesola Oke
{"title":"The Performance Evaluation of Nine Methods for the Estimation of Weibull Distribution Parameters","authors":"S. Lukman, Saulawa B Sani, M. Asani, S. Ojo, Adesola Oke","doi":"10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i1.947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a report on the different methods for estimation of the parameter of the Weibull 2-parameter distribution is presented. The nine approaches were compared in terms of their fits using the statistical criteria (analysis of variance (ANOVA), model of' selection criterion (MSC), Coefficient of Determination (CD), Correlation coefficient (R) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)) to select the best method.  The study revealed that mean rank is the best method among the methods in the graphical and analytical procedures. Numerical simulation studies carried out show that the maximum likelihood estimation method significantly outperformed other methods based on the MSC, CD, R and AIC. The values for the parameters in the Weibull 3-parameter were 1.316, 105.425 mm/h and 0.293 for α, β and λ respectively. The values of  MSC, CD AIC and R were 1.853 and 1.453, 0.860 and 0.802, 211.891 and 295.978, and 0.927 and 0.895 for Weibull 2 and 3 – parameters respectively.  It was concluded that mean rank, symmetric, Lysen and Moment methods are the best based on the values of MSC, CD and R. Care must be taken in selecting MLM, graphical and least square methods for Weibull distribution parameters determined based on the lower values of MSC, CD and R as well as higher values of AIC.","PeriodicalId":323504,"journal":{"name":"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i1.947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a report on the different methods for estimation of the parameter of the Weibull 2-parameter distribution is presented. The nine approaches were compared in terms of their fits using the statistical criteria (analysis of variance (ANOVA), model of' selection criterion (MSC), Coefficient of Determination (CD), Correlation coefficient (R) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)) to select the best method.  The study revealed that mean rank is the best method among the methods in the graphical and analytical procedures. Numerical simulation studies carried out show that the maximum likelihood estimation method significantly outperformed other methods based on the MSC, CD, R and AIC. The values for the parameters in the Weibull 3-parameter were 1.316, 105.425 mm/h and 0.293 for α, β and λ respectively. The values of  MSC, CD AIC and R were 1.853 and 1.453, 0.860 and 0.802, 211.891 and 295.978, and 0.927 and 0.895 for Weibull 2 and 3 – parameters respectively.  It was concluded that mean rank, symmetric, Lysen and Moment methods are the best based on the values of MSC, CD and R. Care must be taken in selecting MLM, graphical and least square methods for Weibull distribution parameters determined based on the lower values of MSC, CD and R as well as higher values of AIC.
九种威布尔分布参数估计方法的性能评价
本文讨论了威布尔2参数分布参数估计的几种方法。采用方差分析(ANOVA)、模型选择准则(MSC)、决定系数(CD)、相关系数(R)和赤池信息准则(AIC)等统计标准对9种方法进行拟合比较,选出最佳方法。研究表明,在图解和分析方法中,平均排序是最好的方法。数值模拟研究表明,极大似然估计方法显著优于基于MSC、CD、R和AIC的其他方法。α、β和λ的Weibull 3参数值分别为1.316、105.425 mm/h和0.293。MSC、CD AIC和R分别为1.853和1.453、0.860和0.802、211.891和295.978,Weibull 2和3参数分别为0.927和0.895。结果表明,基于MSC、CD和R的均值秩法、对称法、Lysen法和矩法是最好的方法。对于基于MSC、CD和R的较低值和AIC的较高值确定的威布尔分布参数,在选择MLM、图解法和最小二乘法时必须注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信