THIRD CHIMURENGA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE COMMERCIAL FARMERS UNION IN ZIMBABWE

Tawanda William Chibanda
{"title":"THIRD CHIMURENGA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE COMMERCIAL FARMERS UNION IN ZIMBABWE","authors":"Tawanda William Chibanda","doi":"10.55190/wbyj3702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on how the white farmers responded to violent take-over of land. Having had a privileged status in society, the white farmers found themselves in a very fragile state as Third Chimurenga began. The violent take-over of land was spearheaded by war veterans. Images of white farmers who were beaten, killed, exiled and driven from their homes became synonymous with land invasions. Such events and acts of eviction became commonly referred to as Jambanja as more and more farmers suffered violent confrontations on their farms. The white farmers were portrayed as being in direct opposition to the government land distribution agenda that had given approval to the invasions and evictions. The article examine the effectiveness of Commercial Farmers Union in responding to the invasions, the new splinter groups and how they responded to the invasions and also the SADC tribunal petition by Mike Campbell. The article will also provide an analysis on how Jambanja spread and how it was carried out. Thus through reading library sources and literature in collections as well as carrying out interviews this article seeks to demonstrate that white farmers tried without much success to resist the sanctioned farm invasions. Ultimately the white farmers lost their prized possession that is the land. The article will highlight the dynamics of land politics in Zimbabwe. Keywords: Commercial Farmers Union, Implications, Jambanja, Land Politics, Third Chimurenga","PeriodicalId":179506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55190/wbyj3702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on how the white farmers responded to violent take-over of land. Having had a privileged status in society, the white farmers found themselves in a very fragile state as Third Chimurenga began. The violent take-over of land was spearheaded by war veterans. Images of white farmers who were beaten, killed, exiled and driven from their homes became synonymous with land invasions. Such events and acts of eviction became commonly referred to as Jambanja as more and more farmers suffered violent confrontations on their farms. The white farmers were portrayed as being in direct opposition to the government land distribution agenda that had given approval to the invasions and evictions. The article examine the effectiveness of Commercial Farmers Union in responding to the invasions, the new splinter groups and how they responded to the invasions and also the SADC tribunal petition by Mike Campbell. The article will also provide an analysis on how Jambanja spread and how it was carried out. Thus through reading library sources and literature in collections as well as carrying out interviews this article seeks to demonstrate that white farmers tried without much success to resist the sanctioned farm invasions. Ultimately the white farmers lost their prized possession that is the land. The article will highlight the dynamics of land politics in Zimbabwe. Keywords: Commercial Farmers Union, Implications, Jambanja, Land Politics, Third Chimurenga
第三,奇穆伦加及其对津巴布韦商业农民联盟的影响
这篇文章关注的是白人农民如何应对暴力侵占土地。白人农民在社会上拥有特权地位,但在第三次奇穆伦加开始时,他们发现自己处于非常脆弱的状态。以暴力夺取土地的行动是由退伍军人带头的。白人农民被殴打、杀害、流放和被赶出家园的画面成为了土地入侵的代名词。随着越来越多的农民在他们的农场遭受暴力对抗,这种事件和驱逐行为通常被称为Jambanja。白人农民被描绘成直接反对政府土地分配议程,该议程批准了入侵和驱逐。这篇文章考察了商业农民联盟应对入侵的有效性、新的分裂团体以及他们如何应对入侵,以及Mike Campbell向SADC法庭提出的请愿书。这篇文章还将分析Jambanja是如何传播的,以及它是如何进行的。因此,通过阅读图书馆资料和馆藏文献以及进行采访,本文试图证明白人农民试图抵抗被批准的农场入侵,但没有取得多大成功。最终白人农民失去了他们最宝贵的财产那就是土地。这篇文章将重点介绍津巴布韦土地政治的动态。关键词:商业农民联盟,影响,Jambanja,土地政治,第三次Chimurenga
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信