Listening Learning Strategy Used by Arabic Education Students

Moh. Sholeh, Afyuddin, M. Syamsul, M. ’. Arif, ©. Moh, Sholeh Afyuddin
{"title":"Listening Learning Strategy Used by Arabic Education Students","authors":"Moh. Sholeh, Afyuddin, M. Syamsul, M. ’. Arif, ©. Moh, Sholeh Afyuddin","doi":"10.58223/alirfan.v6i1.6617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the learning strategies that are reported more often used by Arabic language education students in studying maharah istima' and to elaborate on the practices to provide a comprehensive overview of how to learn istima'. This study is a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design, where the researcher takes quantitative data first, then explores it in more depth through qualitative data. The quantitative data taken through a questionnaire, adapted from O'Malley and Chamot, and Vandergrift's taxonomy of learning strategies, reported that cognitive learning strategies are used by 50.3%, metacognitive learning strategies are used by 39.1%, while socio-affective learning strategies are used by 44.5%. The qualitative data collected by follow-up interviews reported that the cognitive strategies used by students included inferencing, elaboration, imagery, translation, summarization, note-taking, and substitution. Inferencing, elaboration, imagery, and translation strategies are reported to be the most used, compared to summarization, note-taking, and substitution. Metacognitive strategies are reported to be used entirely, namely planning, monitoring, evaluation, and problem identification. Meanwhile, the socio-affective strategy was reported to be the least used of the three learning strategies and only used lowering anxiety, taking emotional temperature, and questioning for clarification.","PeriodicalId":324470,"journal":{"name":"Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58223/alirfan.v6i1.6617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the learning strategies that are reported more often used by Arabic language education students in studying maharah istima' and to elaborate on the practices to provide a comprehensive overview of how to learn istima'. This study is a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design, where the researcher takes quantitative data first, then explores it in more depth through qualitative data. The quantitative data taken through a questionnaire, adapted from O'Malley and Chamot, and Vandergrift's taxonomy of learning strategies, reported that cognitive learning strategies are used by 50.3%, metacognitive learning strategies are used by 39.1%, while socio-affective learning strategies are used by 44.5%. The qualitative data collected by follow-up interviews reported that the cognitive strategies used by students included inferencing, elaboration, imagery, translation, summarization, note-taking, and substitution. Inferencing, elaboration, imagery, and translation strategies are reported to be the most used, compared to summarization, note-taking, and substitution. Metacognitive strategies are reported to be used entirely, namely planning, monitoring, evaluation, and problem identification. Meanwhile, the socio-affective strategy was reported to be the least used of the three learning strategies and only used lowering anxiety, taking emotional temperature, and questioning for clarification.
阿拉伯语教育学生的听力学习策略
本研究旨在揭示阿拉伯语教育学生在学习maharah istima时经常使用的学习策略,并详细说明如何学习istima的实践,以提供全面的概述。本研究采用序贯解释设计的混合方法,研究者先获取定量数据,再通过定性数据进行更深入的探讨。根据O'Malley和Chamot以及Vandergrift的学习策略分类,通过问卷调查获得的定量数据显示,使用认知学习策略的比例为50.3%,使用元认知学习策略的比例为39.1%,使用社会情感学习策略的比例为44.5%。通过随访访谈收集的定性数据表明,学生使用的认知策略包括推理、阐述、意象、翻译、总结、记笔记和替代。据报道,与总结、记笔记和替代相比,推理、阐述、意象和翻译策略使用得最多。据报道,元认知策略被完全使用,即计划、监测、评估和问题识别。同时,社会情感策略是三种学习策略中使用最少的,仅用于降低焦虑、测量情绪温度和提问澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信