{"title":"Book Review | Civic Studies: Approaches to the Emerging Field","authors":"Mark Wilson","doi":"10.21768/EJOPA.V3I1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For faculty and staff in colleges and universities who labor to fulfill higher \neducation’s civic purpose and mission, two challenges generally dominate the \ndiscussion on what it will take to create a culture where the civic mission flourishes: \n1) institutional support to develop and maintain robust civic relationships and \nstudent learning outcomes; and 2) an intellectual shift among departments and \ndisciplines regarding the nature and understanding of scholarship. Institutional \nsupport for civic engagement rises and falls with changes in administration and the \noccasional realignment of priorities. The precarious nature of federal and state \nfunding is not insignificant either. The second challenge—academic departments \nthat eschew non-traditional methods, products, and outputs as inferior and \nunworthy of tenure and promotion—is more complex and pervasive, though \nequally frustrating for those faculty and staff who work to align scholarship with \npublic engagement. As a result, the narrative of the institutionalization of \nuniversity-public engagement is generally negative in tone and less optimistic than \npessimistic. The walls of the ivory tower seem impenetrable to new forms of \nscholarship, especially those that espouse a civic purpose.","PeriodicalId":434223,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Public Affairs","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21768/EJOPA.V3I1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
For faculty and staff in colleges and universities who labor to fulfill higher
education’s civic purpose and mission, two challenges generally dominate the
discussion on what it will take to create a culture where the civic mission flourishes:
1) institutional support to develop and maintain robust civic relationships and
student learning outcomes; and 2) an intellectual shift among departments and
disciplines regarding the nature and understanding of scholarship. Institutional
support for civic engagement rises and falls with changes in administration and the
occasional realignment of priorities. The precarious nature of federal and state
funding is not insignificant either. The second challenge—academic departments
that eschew non-traditional methods, products, and outputs as inferior and
unworthy of tenure and promotion—is more complex and pervasive, though
equally frustrating for those faculty and staff who work to align scholarship with
public engagement. As a result, the narrative of the institutionalization of
university-public engagement is generally negative in tone and less optimistic than
pessimistic. The walls of the ivory tower seem impenetrable to new forms of
scholarship, especially those that espouse a civic purpose.