Hume and Maimonides on Imaginability and Possibility

M. Steiner
{"title":"Hume and Maimonides on Imaginability and Possibility","authors":"M. Steiner","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198811374.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of David Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature is based on the following axiom: Possibility is identical to imaginability. From this axiom, he derives his notorious view that there are no necessary connections between events, as well as his anti-Euclidean propositions that there are minimal distances and times. Maimonides explicitly denounced this axiom as being the central doctrine of the Kalamist theologians of Islam. He proceeds to show the “absurdities” that flow from it, and works out an entire philosophy which he attributes to the Kalam—including the Humean doctrines mentioned above. Since scholars deny the historicity of Maimonides’ “Kalam,” and say that Maimonides was only caricaturing the Kalam in order to discredit it, one arrives at the startling conclusion that Maimonides, hundreds of years before the birth of David Hume, discovered Hume’s philosophy.","PeriodicalId":438846,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Philosophy in an Analytic Age","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Philosophy in an Analytic Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198811374.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of David Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature is based on the following axiom: Possibility is identical to imaginability. From this axiom, he derives his notorious view that there are no necessary connections between events, as well as his anti-Euclidean propositions that there are minimal distances and times. Maimonides explicitly denounced this axiom as being the central doctrine of the Kalamist theologians of Islam. He proceeds to show the “absurdities” that flow from it, and works out an entire philosophy which he attributes to the Kalam—including the Humean doctrines mentioned above. Since scholars deny the historicity of Maimonides’ “Kalam,” and say that Maimonides was only caricaturing the Kalam in order to discredit it, one arrives at the startling conclusion that Maimonides, hundreds of years before the birth of David Hume, discovered Hume’s philosophy.
休谟和迈蒙尼德论可想象性和可能性
大卫·休谟的《人性论》的大部分内容都是基于以下公理:可能性等同于可想象性。从这个公理,他得出了他臭名昭著的观点,即事件之间没有必要的联系,以及他的反欧几里得命题,即存在最小的距离和时间。迈蒙尼德明确谴责这一公理,认为它是伊斯兰卡拉米神学家的中心教义。他继续展示由此而来的“荒谬”,并制定出一整套哲学,他将其归因于卡拉姆,包括上面提到的休谟学说。由于学者们否认迈蒙尼德的《卡拉姆》的历史性,并说迈蒙尼德只是为了诋毁《卡拉姆》而讽刺《卡拉姆》,人们得出了一个令人吃惊的结论:迈蒙尼德在大卫休谟出生几百年前就发现了休谟的哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书