Carotid endarterectomy; A new center, two years results

Arif Arslan, A. Fedakar
{"title":"Carotid endarterectomy; A new center, two years results","authors":"Arif Arslan, A. Fedakar","doi":"10.5455/azjcvs.2022.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics and early postoperative complications of patients who underwent conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a secondary level hospital retrospectively.\nMaterial and Methods: Forty-six patients who operated by a single surgeon at Sinop Ataturk State Hospital between January 2015 to December 2016 were included in the current study. Data regarding to demographic characteristics, symptoms, distribution of lesions, diagnostic methods, operation technique and early complications have been collected from handwritten and electronic clinical records. \nResults: The mean age was found as 70.9±9.7. Thirty patients were male. The most common risk factors were hypertension (93.5%), hyperlipidemia (50%), cigarette (41.3%) and diabetes (34.8%). Conventional CEA (CCEA) was performed to all patients. Patch plasty was applied to only one patient. According to the internal carotid artery stump pressure, T shunt was performed to 17.4% of patients. One patient died in early postoperative period because of myocardial infarction. In four patients; transient dysphagia, in three patients; hematoma requiring revision, in one patient; uncontrolled hypertension, and in one patients wound infection occurred. Furthermore, delirium occurred in one patient.\nConclusion: Our experience CEA are compatible with the literature. Our results have supported that CCEA with measurement of carotid arter stump pressure are reliable surgical procedure for patients with carotid artery stenosis. Cardiac complications are rare but it can be mortal. Minor surgical complications are more common than death and stroke risk. However, close follow-up can prevent serious complications.","PeriodicalId":334840,"journal":{"name":"Azerbaijan Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azerbaijan Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/azjcvs.2022.11.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics and early postoperative complications of patients who underwent conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a secondary level hospital retrospectively. Material and Methods: Forty-six patients who operated by a single surgeon at Sinop Ataturk State Hospital between January 2015 to December 2016 were included in the current study. Data regarding to demographic characteristics, symptoms, distribution of lesions, diagnostic methods, operation technique and early complications have been collected from handwritten and electronic clinical records. Results: The mean age was found as 70.9±9.7. Thirty patients were male. The most common risk factors were hypertension (93.5%), hyperlipidemia (50%), cigarette (41.3%) and diabetes (34.8%). Conventional CEA (CCEA) was performed to all patients. Patch plasty was applied to only one patient. According to the internal carotid artery stump pressure, T shunt was performed to 17.4% of patients. One patient died in early postoperative period because of myocardial infarction. In four patients; transient dysphagia, in three patients; hematoma requiring revision, in one patient; uncontrolled hypertension, and in one patients wound infection occurred. Furthermore, delirium occurred in one patient. Conclusion: Our experience CEA are compatible with the literature. Our results have supported that CCEA with measurement of carotid arter stump pressure are reliable surgical procedure for patients with carotid artery stenosis. Cardiac complications are rare but it can be mortal. Minor surgical complications are more common than death and stroke risk. However, close follow-up can prevent serious complications.
颈动脉内膜切除手术;一个新中心,两年成果
目的:回顾性分析某二级医院行常规颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者的人口学特征及术后早期并发症。材料和方法:本研究纳入2015年1月至2016年12月在Sinop Ataturk州立医院由一名外科医生手术的46例患者。从手写和电子临床记录中收集了有关人口统计学特征、症状、病变分布、诊断方法、手术技术和早期并发症的数据。结果:患者平均年龄70.9±9.7岁。男性30例。最常见的危险因素是高血压(93.5%)、高脂血症(50%)、吸烟(41.3%)和糖尿病(34.8%)。所有患者均行常规CEA (CCEA)。补片成形术仅应用于1例患者。根据颈内动脉残端压力,17.4%的患者行T分流术。1例患者术后早期因心肌梗死死亡。4例患者;短暂性吞咽困难,3例;血肿需要翻修,1例;高血压失控,1例发生伤口感染。此外,有1例患者出现谵妄。结论:我们的经验与文献相符。我们的结果支持测量颈动脉残端压力的CCEA是颈动脉狭窄患者可靠的手术方法。心脏并发症是罕见的,但可能是致命的。轻微的手术并发症比死亡和中风风险更常见。然而,密切的随访可以预防严重的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信