EFFECTS OF EPIPHYTES ON TEA PRODUCTION AND THEIR MANAGEMENT

E. Cheramgoi, J. Langat, R. Mose, C. Mutai
{"title":"EFFECTS OF EPIPHYTES ON TEA PRODUCTION AND THEIR MANAGEMENT","authors":"E. Cheramgoi, J. Langat, R. Mose, C. Mutai","doi":"10.20425/IJTS1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epiphytes are a group of non-parasitic plants that settle to obtain support from plants. Under the natural forest ecosystem, the presence of epiphytes is an indicator of unpolluted and undisturbed environment. However, massive infestation by epiphytes to commercial tree crops including tea is a concern to productivity. A study was conducted initiated to determine the influence of different management options on epiphytes which included mosses, ferns, maidenhair ferns, and tongue ferns. The study evaluated the influence of different management options on epiphytes and to determine the effect of the management options on tea yields. The experiment was laid on a field infested with epiphytes in split plot design treatment structure in a randomized complete block layout, replicated three times. In the main plots the epiphytes were manually removed from the tea bush branches whereas the control was left in situ while the subplots involved use of agricultural chemicals; Copper Nordox, Cuprocaffaro, Milraz, Hydrate of lime, Round up Turbo and control (untreated). Post-treatment scoring for 3 years of all types of epiphytes was done using a scale to determine the level of yellowing, scorching, and regrowth. Yield data were also recorded for one prune cycle of four years and data was subjected to analysis of variance. The main treatments (disturbed and undisturbed) management options did not influence the efficacy of the chemical products on epiphytic mosses but disturbance reduced (p less than or equal to0.05) levels of the epiphytic ferns. Copperbased products (Copper Nordox and Cuprocaffaro) reduced (p less than or equal to0.05) in mosses levels (reducing the degree of yellowing and regrowth) than other products and the control. However, all chemical products reduced (p less than or equal to 0.05) levels of epiphytic ferns. The removal of epiphytes on the tea branches increased (p less than or equal to0.05) the yield of tea, while chemical products were ineffective in improving yields. This study, therefore, concludes that the epiphytes on the tea frame have effects on the functioning of the tea bush and removal of the massive epiphytes is necessary for improved productivity of tea bush.","PeriodicalId":130789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tea Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tea Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20425/IJTS1411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epiphytes are a group of non-parasitic plants that settle to obtain support from plants. Under the natural forest ecosystem, the presence of epiphytes is an indicator of unpolluted and undisturbed environment. However, massive infestation by epiphytes to commercial tree crops including tea is a concern to productivity. A study was conducted initiated to determine the influence of different management options on epiphytes which included mosses, ferns, maidenhair ferns, and tongue ferns. The study evaluated the influence of different management options on epiphytes and to determine the effect of the management options on tea yields. The experiment was laid on a field infested with epiphytes in split plot design treatment structure in a randomized complete block layout, replicated three times. In the main plots the epiphytes were manually removed from the tea bush branches whereas the control was left in situ while the subplots involved use of agricultural chemicals; Copper Nordox, Cuprocaffaro, Milraz, Hydrate of lime, Round up Turbo and control (untreated). Post-treatment scoring for 3 years of all types of epiphytes was done using a scale to determine the level of yellowing, scorching, and regrowth. Yield data were also recorded for one prune cycle of four years and data was subjected to analysis of variance. The main treatments (disturbed and undisturbed) management options did not influence the efficacy of the chemical products on epiphytic mosses but disturbance reduced (p less than or equal to0.05) levels of the epiphytic ferns. Copperbased products (Copper Nordox and Cuprocaffaro) reduced (p less than or equal to0.05) in mosses levels (reducing the degree of yellowing and regrowth) than other products and the control. However, all chemical products reduced (p less than or equal to 0.05) levels of epiphytic ferns. The removal of epiphytes on the tea branches increased (p less than or equal to0.05) the yield of tea, while chemical products were ineffective in improving yields. This study, therefore, concludes that the epiphytes on the tea frame have effects on the functioning of the tea bush and removal of the massive epiphytes is necessary for improved productivity of tea bush.
附生植物对茶叶生产及管理的影响
附生植物是一组非寄生植物,它们定居下来以获得植物的支持。在天然林生态系统中,附生植物的存在是环境未受污染和干扰的标志。然而,附生植物对包括茶叶在内的经济乔木作物的大规模侵染是一个影响生产力的问题。开展了一项研究,以确定不同管理方案对附生植物的影响,包括苔藓、蕨类、毛蕨和舌蕨。本研究评估了不同管理方案对附生植物的影响,并确定了管理方案对茶叶产量的影响。试验设置在附生植物孳生的田间,采用分块设计,处理结构为随机全块布局,重复3次。在主要样地,人工将附生植物从茶树枝条上移除,而对照组则保留原位,而在次要样地则使用农业化学品;Nordox铜,Cuprocaffaro, Milraz,石灰水合物,Round up Turbo和对照(未经处理)。使用量表对所有类型的附生植物进行3年的治疗后评分,以确定发黄,烧焦和再生的水平。还记录了四年一个李子周期的产量数据,并对数据进行方差分析。主要处理(受干扰和未受干扰)的管理方案对附生苔藓的效果没有影响,但干扰降低了附生蕨类的水平(p <或等于0.05)。铜基产品(Nordox Copper和Cuprocaffaro Copper)比其他产品和对照降低了(p <或等于0.05)苔藓水平(降低了黄化和再生的程度)。然而,所有化学产品都降低了附生蕨类植物的水平(p小于或等于0.05)。去除茶枝上的附生植物可以提高茶叶的产量(p <或等于0.05),而化学制剂对提高产量无效。综上所述,茶树架上的附生植物对茶树的功能有影响,去除大量的附生植物是提高茶树生产力的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信