8. Condemnations of Cartesianism: The Extension and Unity of the Universe

R. Ariew
{"title":"8. Condemnations of Cartesianism: The Extension and Unity of the Universe","authors":"R. Ariew","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004207240.i-358.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One can also find Cartesian propositions included in some disputations, but the discussion is mostly negative. There were precedents for Descartes' doctrine of the indefinite extension of the universe. For Descartes, God is the only being in whose perfections one notices no limits, and one can see that he is greater than the world, so that the world cannot be called infinite. A general assessment of the doctrinal difficulties of Cartesianism can be found in a summary of a disputation by the Jesuits of Clermont College during 1665. This chapter discusses the issue of Descartes' definition of substanceand his rejection of substantial forms or real accidents in relation to seventeenth century scholastic doctrines. It examines a more properly cosmological question, that is, whether the condemnation of Principles II, art. 21-22 would be warranted in the light of late scholastic doctrines about the extension and plurality of worlds. .Keywords: Aristotle; Cartesianism; Descartes; Jesuits; unity of universe","PeriodicalId":302082,"journal":{"name":"Descartes and the Last Scholastics","volume":"348 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Descartes and the Last Scholastics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207240.i-358.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One can also find Cartesian propositions included in some disputations, but the discussion is mostly negative. There were precedents for Descartes' doctrine of the indefinite extension of the universe. For Descartes, God is the only being in whose perfections one notices no limits, and one can see that he is greater than the world, so that the world cannot be called infinite. A general assessment of the doctrinal difficulties of Cartesianism can be found in a summary of a disputation by the Jesuits of Clermont College during 1665. This chapter discusses the issue of Descartes' definition of substanceand his rejection of substantial forms or real accidents in relation to seventeenth century scholastic doctrines. It examines a more properly cosmological question, that is, whether the condemnation of Principles II, art. 21-22 would be warranted in the light of late scholastic doctrines about the extension and plurality of worlds. .Keywords: Aristotle; Cartesianism; Descartes; Jesuits; unity of universe
8. 对笛卡儿主义的谴责:宇宙的延伸与统一
人们也可以在一些争论中发现笛卡尔命题,但讨论大多是消极的。笛卡尔关于宇宙无限延伸的学说是有先例的。对笛卡儿来说,上帝是唯一的存在,在他的完美中,人们注意不到任何限制,人们可以看到他比世界更伟大,所以世界不能被称为无限。在1665年克莱蒙特学院的耶稣会士对一场争论的总结中,可以找到对笛卡尔主义教义困难的总体评估。本章讨论了笛卡尔对物质的定义,以及他对物质形式或真实事件的拒绝,这与17世纪的经院学说有关。它考察了一个更恰当的宇宙学问题,即,是否谴责原则二,艺术。根据晚期经院哲学关于世界的延伸性和多元性的学说,第21-22章是有根据的。关键词:亚里士多德;笛卡儿哲学;笛卡尔;耶稣会士;宇宙的统一性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信