Risk Priority Number vs Action Priority in Electrical Systems

L. Petrescu, Maria-Cǎtǎlina Petrescu, E. Cazacu, V. Ioniță
{"title":"Risk Priority Number vs Action Priority in Electrical Systems","authors":"L. Petrescu, Maria-Cǎtǎlina Petrescu, E. Cazacu, V. Ioniță","doi":"10.1109/ATEE52255.2021.9425178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) is an important tool in evaluating a product or service either before it is made or prior to its market placing. Its purpose is to reduce any subsequent expenses due to defects. The principle of this tool says that it is cheaper to prevent than to repair. In the automotive industry, FMEA is widely implemented, but there is a clearer trend in recent years to move from Risk Priority Number (RPN) analysis to Action Priority (AP) one. The aim of this paper is to present a comparative analysis between FMEA using RPN and AP, respectively. Consequently, we started from an FMEA made for Electronic Stability Control (ESC) which is more and more present on today's cars. The obtained results clearly indicate the lack of an integrative approach to the two evaluation modalities starting from the RPN determination, but the action plan being correlated with the AP.","PeriodicalId":359645,"journal":{"name":"2021 12th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering (ATEE)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 12th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering (ATEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATEE52255.2021.9425178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) is an important tool in evaluating a product or service either before it is made or prior to its market placing. Its purpose is to reduce any subsequent expenses due to defects. The principle of this tool says that it is cheaper to prevent than to repair. In the automotive industry, FMEA is widely implemented, but there is a clearer trend in recent years to move from Risk Priority Number (RPN) analysis to Action Priority (AP) one. The aim of this paper is to present a comparative analysis between FMEA using RPN and AP, respectively. Consequently, we started from an FMEA made for Electronic Stability Control (ESC) which is more and more present on today's cars. The obtained results clearly indicate the lack of an integrative approach to the two evaluation modalities starting from the RPN determination, but the action plan being correlated with the AP.
电气系统中的风险优先级数与行动优先级
FMEA(失效模式和影响分析)是在产品或服务制造之前或投放市场之前评估产品或服务的重要工具。其目的是减少由于缺陷而产生的后续费用。这种工具的原理是预防比修理便宜。在汽车行业,FMEA得到了广泛的应用,但近年来有一个更明显的趋势,即从风险优先级(RPN)分析转向行动优先级(AP)分析。本文的目的是对分别使用RPN和AP的FMEA进行比较分析。因此,我们从电子稳定控制(ESC)的FMEA开始,这在今天的汽车上越来越多地出现。所获得的结果清楚地表明,缺乏从RPN确定开始的两种评估模式的综合方法,但行动计划与AP相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信