Abandoning the Federal Role in Education: The Every Student Succeeds Act

D. W. Black
{"title":"Abandoning the Federal Role in Education: The Every Student Succeeds Act","authors":"D. W. Black","doi":"10.15779/Z38Z31NN9K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congress recently passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), redefining the role of the federal government in education. The ESSA attempted to appease popular sentiment against the No Child Left Behind Act’s (NCLB) overreliance on standardized testing and punitive sanctions. But in overturning those aspects of NCLB, Congress failed to devise a system that was any better. Congress simply stripped the federal government of regulatory power and vastly expanded state discretion. For the first time in fifty years, the federal government now lacks the ability to prompt improvements in student achievement or to demand equal resources for low-income students. Thus, the ESSA rests on a bold premise: states will abandon their historical tendencies by voluntarily providing low-income students with equal educational opportunities.Although the ESSA remains committed to equality on its face, it does the opposite in practice. First, the ESSA affords states wide latitude on student performance, accountability, and school reform. Wide state discretion opens the door to fifty disparate state systems, none of which guarantee equality. Second, the ESSA directly weakens two existing equity standards and leaves untouched a loophole that exempts eighty percent of school expenditures from equity analysis. Third, the ESSA leaves federal funding flat, eliminating the possibility that additional resources will offset the inequalities that the foregoing provisions permit. These changes to federal education law are so out of character that they beg the question of why the federal government is even involved in education at all. Although Congress is unlikely to repeal the ESSA just months after passing it, it is set to expire by its own terms after four years. This Article proposes that Congress cure the ESSA’s flaws by increasing the federal investment in education to: 1) create the leverage needed for states to accept federal prohibitions on unequal funding practices; and 2) meet the outstanding needs of low-income students.","PeriodicalId":125020,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Legislatures eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z31NN9K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Congress recently passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), redefining the role of the federal government in education. The ESSA attempted to appease popular sentiment against the No Child Left Behind Act’s (NCLB) overreliance on standardized testing and punitive sanctions. But in overturning those aspects of NCLB, Congress failed to devise a system that was any better. Congress simply stripped the federal government of regulatory power and vastly expanded state discretion. For the first time in fifty years, the federal government now lacks the ability to prompt improvements in student achievement or to demand equal resources for low-income students. Thus, the ESSA rests on a bold premise: states will abandon their historical tendencies by voluntarily providing low-income students with equal educational opportunities.Although the ESSA remains committed to equality on its face, it does the opposite in practice. First, the ESSA affords states wide latitude on student performance, accountability, and school reform. Wide state discretion opens the door to fifty disparate state systems, none of which guarantee equality. Second, the ESSA directly weakens two existing equity standards and leaves untouched a loophole that exempts eighty percent of school expenditures from equity analysis. Third, the ESSA leaves federal funding flat, eliminating the possibility that additional resources will offset the inequalities that the foregoing provisions permit. These changes to federal education law are so out of character that they beg the question of why the federal government is even involved in education at all. Although Congress is unlikely to repeal the ESSA just months after passing it, it is set to expire by its own terms after four years. This Article proposes that Congress cure the ESSA’s flaws by increasing the federal investment in education to: 1) create the leverage needed for states to accept federal prohibitions on unequal funding practices; and 2) meet the outstanding needs of low-income students.
放弃联邦政府在教育中的角色:《每个学生都成功法案》
国会最近通过了《每个学生成功法案》(ESSA),重新定义了联邦政府在教育中的角色。《不让一个孩子掉队法案》(NCLB)过度依赖标准化测试和惩罚性制裁,该法案试图安抚民众的情绪。但在推翻NCLB的这些方面时,国会没能设计出一个更好的体系。国会只是剥夺了联邦政府的监管权力,并极大地扩大了各州的自由裁量权。五十年来,联邦政府第一次没有能力促进学生成绩的提高,也没有能力为低收入家庭的学生要求平等的资源。因此,ESSA建立在一个大胆的前提之上:各州将放弃其历史倾向,自愿为低收入家庭的学生提供平等的教育机会。尽管ESSA表面上仍然致力于平等,但实际上却恰恰相反。首先,ESSA在学生表现、问责制和学校改革方面给予各州广泛的自由。广泛的州自由裁量权为50个不同的州制度打开了大门,没有一个能保证平等。其次,ESSA直接削弱了现有的两项公平标准,并没有触及一个漏洞,即80%的学校支出不受公平分析的影响。第三,《教育改革法案》让联邦资金保持不变,消除了用额外资源来抵消前述条款所允许的不平等的可能性。这些对联邦教育法的修改是如此的不合情理,以至于人们不禁要问,为什么联邦政府要参与教育?尽管国会不太可能在通过几个月后就废除ESSA,但它将在四年后按照自己的期限到期。本文建议国会通过增加联邦对教育的投资来纠正ESSA的缺陷:1)创造必要的杠杆,使各州接受联邦对不平等拨款做法的禁令;2)满足低收入家庭学生的突出需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信