Arrays vs. Decision Diagrams: A Case Study on Quantum Circuit Simulators

Thomas Grurl, Jürgen Fuß, S. Hillmich, Lukas Burgholzer, R. Wille
{"title":"Arrays vs. Decision Diagrams: A Case Study on Quantum Circuit Simulators","authors":"Thomas Grurl, Jürgen Fuß, S. Hillmich, Lukas Burgholzer, R. Wille","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL49045.2020.000-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the recent progress in the physical implementation of quantum computers, a significant amount of research still depends on the use of quantum circuit simulators running on classical hardware. While there are several techniques for quantum circuit simulation, many state-of-the-art simulators rely on an array-based simulation approach. However, this array-based approach has exponential memory complexity with respect to the number of simulated qubits. To address this drawback, complementary approaches based on decision diagrams have been proposed. While these approaches allow simulating circuits that could not be simulated before, they come with their own drawbacks. Unfortunately, no detailed case study has been conducted to date, which compares those complementary approaches and their respective strengths and weaknesses. In this work, we are addressing this by providing a survey on both approaches as well as a detailed case study on their respective performances.","PeriodicalId":421588,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 50th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 50th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL49045.2020.000-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Despite the recent progress in the physical implementation of quantum computers, a significant amount of research still depends on the use of quantum circuit simulators running on classical hardware. While there are several techniques for quantum circuit simulation, many state-of-the-art simulators rely on an array-based simulation approach. However, this array-based approach has exponential memory complexity with respect to the number of simulated qubits. To address this drawback, complementary approaches based on decision diagrams have been proposed. While these approaches allow simulating circuits that could not be simulated before, they come with their own drawbacks. Unfortunately, no detailed case study has been conducted to date, which compares those complementary approaches and their respective strengths and weaknesses. In this work, we are addressing this by providing a survey on both approaches as well as a detailed case study on their respective performances.
阵列与决策图:量子电路模拟器的案例研究
尽管最近在量子计算机的物理实现方面取得了进展,但大量的研究仍然依赖于使用运行在经典硬件上的量子电路模拟器。虽然量子电路模拟有几种技术,但许多最先进的模拟器依赖于基于阵列的模拟方法。然而,这种基于数组的方法相对于模拟量子位的数量具有指数级的内存复杂性。为了解决这个缺点,已经提出了基于决策图的补充方法。虽然这些方法可以模拟以前无法模拟的电路,但它们也有自己的缺点。遗憾的是,迄今为止还没有进行详细的个案研究,对这些互补的办法及其各自的优缺点进行比较。在这项工作中,我们通过对这两种方法的调查以及对其各自性能的详细案例研究来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信