Leading Approaches to Conceptualizing the Quality of Higher Education

V. Sizikova, Anna Rybakova, M. Vinogradova
{"title":"Leading Approaches to Conceptualizing the Quality of Higher Education","authors":"V. Sizikova, Anna Rybakova, M. Vinogradova","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.191221.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on comparing the two leading approaches to conceptualizing of measuring quality in the system of higher education. Specifically, we focus on the two main prevailing approaches, namely the continental one, and the Anglo-Saxon one. Both approaches are widely used, and both have their pros and cons. These approaches have radically different views on educational efficiency, thus dividing the concept and describing it from qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Our results show that the most effective way for the educational organization to enhance the quality of its services would be to consider its activities from a variety of angles, scrutinizing financial resources, goals and objectives to better understand and rationalize the choice of this or that development strategy. We think that national educational system needs thorough comparative analysis but not copy-pasting practices if they are striving to be leading in the world educational arena.","PeriodicalId":215466,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social, Economic, and Academic Leadership (ICSEALV 2019)","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social, Economic, and Academic Leadership (ICSEALV 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191221.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on comparing the two leading approaches to conceptualizing of measuring quality in the system of higher education. Specifically, we focus on the two main prevailing approaches, namely the continental one, and the Anglo-Saxon one. Both approaches are widely used, and both have their pros and cons. These approaches have radically different views on educational efficiency, thus dividing the concept and describing it from qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Our results show that the most effective way for the educational organization to enhance the quality of its services would be to consider its activities from a variety of angles, scrutinizing financial resources, goals and objectives to better understand and rationalize the choice of this or that development strategy. We think that national educational system needs thorough comparative analysis but not copy-pasting practices if they are striving to be leading in the world educational arena.
高等教育质量概念化的主要途径
本文着重比较了高等教育体系中衡量质量概念的两种主要方法。具体来说,我们将关注两种主要的流行方法,即大陆方法和盎格鲁-撒克逊方法。这两种方法都被广泛使用,都有各自的优点和缺点。这两种方法对教育效率的看法截然不同,从而将这一概念划分开来,并从定性和定量的角度对其进行描述。我们的研究结果表明,教育机构提高其服务质量的最有效途径是从多个角度考虑其活动,仔细审查财政资源,目标和目的,以更好地理解和合理化选择这种或那种发展战略。我们认为,如果一个国家的教育体系想要在世界教育舞台上领先,就需要彻底的比较分析,而不是照搬照抄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信