Measurement of the Intensity and Phase of Femtosecond Pulses Using Spectrally Resolved Self-Diffraction

D. Kane, R. Trebino
{"title":"Measurement of the Intensity and Phase of Femtosecond Pulses Using Spectrally Resolved Self-Diffraction","authors":"D. Kane, R. Trebino","doi":"10.1364/up.1992.fc8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The technology of ultrashort-pulse measurement has been under development since the advent of ultrashort-pulse lasers over two decades ago. Early methods yielded only the intensity autocorrelation of the pulse.1,2 Later developments have achieved the indirect determination of various phase distortions common to ultrashort pulses.3,4 Unfortunately, these methods do not yield the pulse shape or the phase (or, equivalently, the instantaneous frequency) evolution of the pulse, but instead yield traces that only indirectly indicate each and require an assumed model of the pulse. Some work has been done to extract these quantities,5 but general methods have not yet emerged. Researchers have attempted to implement iterative algorithms to invert these traces to obtain the precise pulse shape and phase.6,7 While such techniques have reconstructed pulses, there remain fundamental inherent ambiguities in any algorithm that uses the above traces. These ambiguities include the direction of time.6 It is therefore not possible to determine, for example, the sign of a chirp. In an important recent development, however, Chilla and Martinez8 have demonstrated a method that directly obtains the pulse shape and phase in the frequency domain. Extending work first performed by Fork, et al.,\n 9\n their method involves frequency-filtering the pulse and cross-correlating the filtered pulse with the shorter unfiltered pulse, yielding the time vs. frequency, which is integrated to yield the phase vs. frequency. This result, in conjunction with the spectrum, is the pulse field in the frequency domain, and Fourier transformation then yields the intensity and phase in the time domain. This method is an important development, so it is reasonable that other methods achieving a similar end be considered.","PeriodicalId":242710,"journal":{"name":"Eighth International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/up.1992.fc8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The technology of ultrashort-pulse measurement has been under development since the advent of ultrashort-pulse lasers over two decades ago. Early methods yielded only the intensity autocorrelation of the pulse.1,2 Later developments have achieved the indirect determination of various phase distortions common to ultrashort pulses.3,4 Unfortunately, these methods do not yield the pulse shape or the phase (or, equivalently, the instantaneous frequency) evolution of the pulse, but instead yield traces that only indirectly indicate each and require an assumed model of the pulse. Some work has been done to extract these quantities,5 but general methods have not yet emerged. Researchers have attempted to implement iterative algorithms to invert these traces to obtain the precise pulse shape and phase.6,7 While such techniques have reconstructed pulses, there remain fundamental inherent ambiguities in any algorithm that uses the above traces. These ambiguities include the direction of time.6 It is therefore not possible to determine, for example, the sign of a chirp. In an important recent development, however, Chilla and Martinez8 have demonstrated a method that directly obtains the pulse shape and phase in the frequency domain. Extending work first performed by Fork, et al., 9 their method involves frequency-filtering the pulse and cross-correlating the filtered pulse with the shorter unfiltered pulse, yielding the time vs. frequency, which is integrated to yield the phase vs. frequency. This result, in conjunction with the spectrum, is the pulse field in the frequency domain, and Fourier transformation then yields the intensity and phase in the time domain. This method is an important development, so it is reasonable that other methods achieving a similar end be considered.
利用光谱分辨自衍射测量飞秒脉冲的强度和相位
自二十多年前超短脉冲激光问世以来,超短脉冲测量技术一直处于发展阶段。早期的方法只得到脉冲的强度自相关。1,2后来的发展已经实现了对超短脉冲常见的各种相位畸变的间接测定。3,4不幸的是,这些方法不能得到脉冲的形状或相位(或等效的瞬时频率)演变,而只能得到间接指示每一种的轨迹,并且需要一个假设的脉冲模型。已经做了一些工作来提取这些量,但还没有出现一般的方法。研究人员已经尝试实施迭代算法来反转这些轨迹,以获得精确的脉冲形状和相位。6,7虽然这些技术已经重建了脉冲,但在使用上述轨迹的任何算法中仍然存在基本的固有模糊性。这些模糊性包括时间的方向因此,不可能确定,例如,啁啾的标志。然而,在最近的一项重要进展中,奇拉和马丁内斯8展示了一种在频域中直接获得脉冲形状和相位的方法。首先由Fork等人完成的扩展工作,9他们的方法包括对脉冲进行频率滤波,并将滤波后的脉冲与较短的未滤波脉冲进行交叉相关,得到时间与频率的关系,再将其积分得到相位与频率的关系。这个结果,与频谱相结合,就是频域的脉冲场,然后傅里叶变换得到时域的强度和相位。这种方法是一项重要的发展,因此考虑其他达到类似目的的方法是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信