Simulated or Reproduced Reality Events as the Basis of Reflective Learning

R. Wlodarsky, H. Walters, Paula Baughn
{"title":"Simulated or Reproduced Reality Events as the Basis of Reflective Learning","authors":"R. Wlodarsky, H. Walters, Paula Baughn","doi":"10.11648/J.IJPBS.20190404.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the literature, the authors observe a common pattern of learner reaction to simulations. Learners engage in simulated events that is similar to that which would be encountered in the real world. There is a translation, through cognition, of the simulated experience to real-world-learning, in a way that directly situates the learners for reengagement of the real world beyond the simulation. In the current study, the authors have linked these observations to a new set of response data from a study of university professors, in an effort to understand, develop, and support personal and professional development strategies and opportunities for professors across the university. A voluntary sample comprised of 40 professors from two different universities in the Midwest, were asked in a survey to define reflection and discuss cognitive processes that facilitated reflection on their own professional development. A constant comparative procedure, a qualitative coding strategy, was used to examine the data collected and the data were coded for clusters of similar behaviors. This coding was converted to visual representation using concept mapping techniques. A preponderance of participants used the same reflective process to consider, evaluate, describe and structure their professional activities, which began with an experience-an event-of practice and was clearly a precipitating experience linked to a subsequent cognitive processing. For many participants, the event serving as the basis for reflection is not grounded in an historical, real-world or authentic experience; but rather there was a shift to use of simulated or reproduced events that is clear and significant. It seems clear from the authors’ research findings and that of others cited in this paper, that simulations of experience possess the ability to transfer to real-world growth, development, and decision-making and would be preferred for vocational education uses over the reliance on authentic field and clinical experiences. Consideration of simulations as an experiential method for professional growth and development efforts seems, in this analysis, quite more complex an issue when one considers the implications of linguistics and language development to behavioral coding; the uses of cognitive tools to aid learning; and the manner in which language itself shapes, empowers or impedes the embedding of experience into human memory—and activates that memory for professional and personal action. The authors perceive that, while much progress has been made in highlighting these issues and their relationships, much work remains ahead.","PeriodicalId":106936,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJPBS.20190404.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the literature, the authors observe a common pattern of learner reaction to simulations. Learners engage in simulated events that is similar to that which would be encountered in the real world. There is a translation, through cognition, of the simulated experience to real-world-learning, in a way that directly situates the learners for reengagement of the real world beyond the simulation. In the current study, the authors have linked these observations to a new set of response data from a study of university professors, in an effort to understand, develop, and support personal and professional development strategies and opportunities for professors across the university. A voluntary sample comprised of 40 professors from two different universities in the Midwest, were asked in a survey to define reflection and discuss cognitive processes that facilitated reflection on their own professional development. A constant comparative procedure, a qualitative coding strategy, was used to examine the data collected and the data were coded for clusters of similar behaviors. This coding was converted to visual representation using concept mapping techniques. A preponderance of participants used the same reflective process to consider, evaluate, describe and structure their professional activities, which began with an experience-an event-of practice and was clearly a precipitating experience linked to a subsequent cognitive processing. For many participants, the event serving as the basis for reflection is not grounded in an historical, real-world or authentic experience; but rather there was a shift to use of simulated or reproduced events that is clear and significant. It seems clear from the authors’ research findings and that of others cited in this paper, that simulations of experience possess the ability to transfer to real-world growth, development, and decision-making and would be preferred for vocational education uses over the reliance on authentic field and clinical experiences. Consideration of simulations as an experiential method for professional growth and development efforts seems, in this analysis, quite more complex an issue when one considers the implications of linguistics and language development to behavioral coding; the uses of cognitive tools to aid learning; and the manner in which language itself shapes, empowers or impedes the embedding of experience into human memory—and activates that memory for professional and personal action. The authors perceive that, while much progress has been made in highlighting these issues and their relationships, much work remains ahead.
模拟或复制现实事件作为反思性学习的基础
在文献中,作者观察到学习者对模拟的共同反应模式。学习者参与的模拟事件与在现实世界中遇到的事件相似。通过认知,将模拟的经验转化为现实世界的学习,以一种直接使学习者在模拟之外重新参与现实世界的方式。在当前的研究中,作者将这些观察结果与一项针对大学教授的研究中的一组新的回应数据联系起来,以努力理解、开发和支持整个大学教授的个人和专业发展战略和机会。来自中西部两所不同大学的40名教授自愿参与了一项调查,他们被要求定义反思,并讨论促进他们对自己职业发展进行反思的认知过程。一个恒定的比较程序,定性编码策略,被用来检查收集的数据和数据编码的集群相似的行为。使用概念映射技术将此编码转换为可视化表示。大多数参与者使用相同的反思过程来考虑、评估、描述和组织他们的专业活动,这始于一次实践经验——一个事件,显然是一个与随后的认知过程相关的沉淀经验。对于许多参与者来说,作为反思基础的事件不是基于历史、现实世界或真实的经验;而是有一种转变,即使用模拟或再现的事件,这是明确而重要的。从作者的研究结果和论文中引用的其他人的研究结果中可以清楚地看出,模拟经验具有转移到现实世界的成长、发展和决策的能力,并且比依赖真实的实地和临床经验更适合职业教育。在这种分析中,当考虑到语言学和语言发展对行为编码的影响时,将模拟作为一种专业成长和发展努力的经验方法似乎是一个更复杂的问题;使用认知工具帮助学习;以及语言本身塑造、强化或阻碍经验嵌入人类记忆的方式,以及为专业和个人行动激活记忆的方式。作者认为,虽然在强调这些问题及其关系方面取得了很大进展,但仍有许多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信