How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector

L. Laurin, M. Prox, A. Moeller, M. Schmidt
{"title":"How production-theory can support the analysis of recycling systems in the electronic waste sector","authors":"L. Laurin, M. Prox, A. Moeller, M. Schmidt","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question surrounding \"greener\" products has always been, \"at what cost?\" Several decades ago, it was assumed that the product that was easier on the environment would cost more to produce, yet would not command a higher price. Regulations, such as the European WEEE directive, and emissions trading are ways in which governments have changed the market paradigm, rewarding lower polluting manufacturers. With complex issues at stake within a production system, it becomes more difficult to measure the trade-offs between environmental benefit and economics. A modern approach in production theory of business and management economics enables this complex calculation by valuing everything in the system. This approach proposes that objects (e.g. materials) are defined as good, bad, or neutral. In transformation processes in production or recycling systems this makes it possible to distinguish stringently between the economic revenue of a process and the economic and ecological expenditures for it. Materials and energy classified as good are considered as an expense if they are used by the system and a product or revenue, if they are created by the system. This approach can be transferred to entire systems of processes in order to determine the system revenue and the system expenditure. The process can be more easily understood using material flow networks or graphs. In complex material flow systems, it becomes possible to calculate not only the costs, but also the direct and indirect environmental impacts of an individual process or system revenue (for example a product or the elimination of waste) consistently. The approach permits a stringent analysis as well as different analysis perspectives of a material and energy flow system. It is particularly suitable for closed-loop economic systems in which material backflows occur. This paper outlines how this approach can be employed in the field of e-waste management","PeriodicalId":141255,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The question surrounding "greener" products has always been, "at what cost?" Several decades ago, it was assumed that the product that was easier on the environment would cost more to produce, yet would not command a higher price. Regulations, such as the European WEEE directive, and emissions trading are ways in which governments have changed the market paradigm, rewarding lower polluting manufacturers. With complex issues at stake within a production system, it becomes more difficult to measure the trade-offs between environmental benefit and economics. A modern approach in production theory of business and management economics enables this complex calculation by valuing everything in the system. This approach proposes that objects (e.g. materials) are defined as good, bad, or neutral. In transformation processes in production or recycling systems this makes it possible to distinguish stringently between the economic revenue of a process and the economic and ecological expenditures for it. Materials and energy classified as good are considered as an expense if they are used by the system and a product or revenue, if they are created by the system. This approach can be transferred to entire systems of processes in order to determine the system revenue and the system expenditure. The process can be more easily understood using material flow networks or graphs. In complex material flow systems, it becomes possible to calculate not only the costs, but also the direct and indirect environmental impacts of an individual process or system revenue (for example a product or the elimination of waste) consistently. The approach permits a stringent analysis as well as different analysis perspectives of a material and energy flow system. It is particularly suitable for closed-loop economic systems in which material backflows occur. This paper outlines how this approach can be employed in the field of e-waste management
生产理论如何支持对电子废物部门回收系统的分析
围绕“绿色”产品的问题一直是“代价是什么?”几十年前,人们认为对环境更友好的产品生产成本会更高,但价格不会更高。法规,如欧洲报废电子电气设备指令和排放交易是政府改变市场模式的方式,奖励污染较低的制造商。由于生产系统中存在复杂的问题,衡量环境效益和经济效益之间的权衡变得更加困难。商业和管理经济学生产理论中的现代方法通过评估系统中的一切来实现这种复杂的计算。这种方法建议将对象(例如材料)定义为好、坏或中性。在生产或回收系统的改造过程中,这使得有可能严格区分一个过程的经济收入及其经济和生态支出。分类为商品的材料和能源,如果被系统使用,则被视为费用;如果被系统创造,则被视为产品或收入。这种方法可以转移到整个流程系统,以确定系统收入和系统支出。使用物料流网络或图形可以更容易地理解该过程。在复杂的物料流系统中,不仅可以计算成本,还可以持续计算单个过程或系统收入(例如产品或消除浪费)的直接和间接环境影响。该方法允许严格的分析,以及不同的分析角度的物质和能量流系统。它特别适用于发生物质回流的闭环经济系统。本文概述了如何将这种方法应用于电子废物管理领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信