Adaptation and Examination of the Greek General Formative Assessment Framework P.D./152/2013 in Physical Education Teachers

Georgia Arampatzi, Vassiliki Derri, Kyriaki Emmanouilidou, Pavlos Kyrgyridis
{"title":"Adaptation and Examination of the Greek General Formative Assessment Framework P.D./152/2013 in Physical Education Teachers","authors":"Georgia Arampatzi, Vassiliki Derri, Kyriaki Emmanouilidou, Pavlos Kyrgyridis","doi":"10.36348/jaspe.2019.v02i08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to adapt and clarify the criteria of the Greek general assessment framework of the Presidential Decree (P.D.)152/2013 in the physical education subject and to examine the tool‟s validity and reliability. Secondary aims were a) the discrimination of the teachers according to their observed performance, and b) the examination of the effect of school grade in teaching effectiveness. The P.D. 152/2013 includes five categories analyzed in 15 criteria on a mixed four-level rubric (Incomplete, Sufficient, Very Good, Excellent). In the current research, the 10 observable criteria of three categories that relate to teaching were used. The criteria were analyzed in detail, clarified and adapted, according to international literature on physical education (PE) teaching effectiveness. Following the step-bystep upgrade of the rubric‟s levels (the same indicator at all levels but each time with more qualitative characteristics), 41 indicators were developed. In order to examine the validity and reliability of the adapted tool, trained evaluators observed in person 40 PE lessons taught in early and in upper grades by 20 PE teachers. The lessons were assessed in every indicator of the rubric, and classified in one of the four performance levels. Principal Component Analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-squared and ANOVA tests were carried out to examine the construct validity of the tool. The results revealed that the adapted rubric to the PE subject included the three initial categories, seven criteria and 26 indicators and can be considered as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing PE teachers‟ effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":359676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Sports and Physical Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Sports and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/jaspe.2019.v02i08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to adapt and clarify the criteria of the Greek general assessment framework of the Presidential Decree (P.D.)152/2013 in the physical education subject and to examine the tool‟s validity and reliability. Secondary aims were a) the discrimination of the teachers according to their observed performance, and b) the examination of the effect of school grade in teaching effectiveness. The P.D. 152/2013 includes five categories analyzed in 15 criteria on a mixed four-level rubric (Incomplete, Sufficient, Very Good, Excellent). In the current research, the 10 observable criteria of three categories that relate to teaching were used. The criteria were analyzed in detail, clarified and adapted, according to international literature on physical education (PE) teaching effectiveness. Following the step-bystep upgrade of the rubric‟s levels (the same indicator at all levels but each time with more qualitative characteristics), 41 indicators were developed. In order to examine the validity and reliability of the adapted tool, trained evaluators observed in person 40 PE lessons taught in early and in upper grades by 20 PE teachers. The lessons were assessed in every indicator of the rubric, and classified in one of the four performance levels. Principal Component Analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-squared and ANOVA tests were carried out to examine the construct validity of the tool. The results revealed that the adapted rubric to the PE subject included the three initial categories, seven criteria and 26 indicators and can be considered as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing PE teachers‟ effectiveness.
希腊一般形成性评估框架P.D./152/2013在体育教师中的适应与检验
本研究的目的是适应和澄清希腊总统令(P.D.)152/2013体育学科总体评估框架的标准,并检查该工具的有效性和可靠性。次要目标是a)根据教师的表现对他们进行歧视,b)检查学校成绩对教学效果的影响。P.D. 152/2013包括五个类别,在混合的四个级别(不完整,充分,非常好,优秀)的15个标准中进行分析。在本研究中,我们使用了与教学相关的三类10个可观察标准。根据国际上有关体育教学有效性的文献,对标准进行了详细的分析、澄清和调整。在逐步提升分类级别(所有级别的指标相同,但每次都具有更多的定性特征)之后,制定了41个指标。为了检验适应性工具的有效性和可靠性,训练有素的评估人员亲自观察了20名体育教师在早期和高年级教授的40节体育课。课程在每个指标中都进行了评估,并在四个表现水平中进行了分类。采用主成分分析、描述性统计、卡方和方差分析检验该工具的结构效度。结果表明,体育学科的适应指标包括3个初始类别、7个标准和26个指标,可以被认为是评估体育教师效能的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信