Species and functional diversity of direct-seeded vegetation declines over 25 years

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Joe Atkinson, Charlotte Simpson-Young, Graham Fifield, Barton Schneemann, Stephen P. Bonser, Angela T. Moles
{"title":"Species and functional diversity of direct-seeded vegetation declines over 25 years","authors":"Joe Atkinson,&nbsp;Charlotte Simpson-Young,&nbsp;Graham Fifield,&nbsp;Barton Schneemann,&nbsp;Stephen P. Bonser,&nbsp;Angela T. Moles","doi":"10.1111/emr.12570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The re-establishment of native vegetation on disturbed land has been adopted widely as a form of ecological restoration in the past few decades. It is often suggested that establishing native plantings will lead to increasing biodiversity at restoration sites over time. However, this prediction has not been tested over long periods. Now that some pioneering projects and monitoring programs have become older, it is possible to quantify the long-term benefits of native vegetation plantings. We asked how the plant diversity and function of 12 biodiverse native vegetation plantings has changed over approximately 30 years. We found that sites declined in measures of functional and species diversity over time. Shorter-statured woody species were not as common at older sites. Surprisingly, sites initially seeded with a greater richness of species did not have higher standing richness at any later census period. While all sites produced net native biodiversity benefits relative to the exotic pastures they replaced, ongoing management and monitoring will be needed to ensure they continue to do so. Understanding the relationship between ageing native vegetation plantings and other components of the ecosystem (e.g., mammals, birds, invertebrates, soil, microorganisms) is a priority. Our results suggest that recruitment barriers in ex-agricultural ecosystems are high and that the biodiversity benefits provided by shorter-lived species will only be transient without ongoing management of these systems. Research confronting these recruitment barriers is a priority, and managers (and funders) of these kinds of restoration projects may need to be prepared for ongoing management of sites to promote lost components if they are desired as continual features of these ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 3","pages":"252-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12570","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The re-establishment of native vegetation on disturbed land has been adopted widely as a form of ecological restoration in the past few decades. It is often suggested that establishing native plantings will lead to increasing biodiversity at restoration sites over time. However, this prediction has not been tested over long periods. Now that some pioneering projects and monitoring programs have become older, it is possible to quantify the long-term benefits of native vegetation plantings. We asked how the plant diversity and function of 12 biodiverse native vegetation plantings has changed over approximately 30 years. We found that sites declined in measures of functional and species diversity over time. Shorter-statured woody species were not as common at older sites. Surprisingly, sites initially seeded with a greater richness of species did not have higher standing richness at any later census period. While all sites produced net native biodiversity benefits relative to the exotic pastures they replaced, ongoing management and monitoring will be needed to ensure they continue to do so. Understanding the relationship between ageing native vegetation plantings and other components of the ecosystem (e.g., mammals, birds, invertebrates, soil, microorganisms) is a priority. Our results suggest that recruitment barriers in ex-agricultural ecosystems are high and that the biodiversity benefits provided by shorter-lived species will only be transient without ongoing management of these systems. Research confronting these recruitment barriers is a priority, and managers (and funders) of these kinds of restoration projects may need to be prepared for ongoing management of sites to promote lost components if they are desired as continual features of these ecosystems.

Abstract Image

25年来直接播种植被的物种和功能多样性呈下降趋势
在过去的几十年里,重建受干扰土地上的原生植被作为一种生态恢复方式被广泛采用。人们经常建议,随着时间的推移,建立本地植物将导致恢复地点的生物多样性增加。然而,这一预测并没有经过长期的检验。现在,一些开创性的项目和监测项目已经过时,有可能量化原生植被种植的长期效益。我们研究了近30年来12种生物多样性原生植被的植物多样性和功能是如何变化的。我们发现,随着时间的推移,这些地点的功能和物种多样性都在下降。较矮的木本物种在较老的地点不常见。令人惊讶的是,最初播种物种丰富度较高的地点在任何后来的普查期间都没有更高的立地丰富度。虽然相对于它们所取代的外来牧场,所有的地点都产生了本地生物多样性的净收益,但需要进行持续的管理和监测,以确保它们继续这样做。了解老化的原生植被与生态系统其他组成部分(如哺乳动物、鸟类、无脊椎动物、土壤、微生物)之间的关系是一个优先事项。我们的研究结果表明,前农业生态系统的物种招募障碍很高,如果没有对这些系统的持续管理,寿命较短的物种提供的生物多样性效益将只是暂时的。面对这些招募障碍的研究是一个优先事项,这类恢复项目的管理者(和资助者)可能需要准备好对遗址进行持续管理,以促进失去的组成部分,如果它们是这些生态系统的持续特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信