SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE DESIGN OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL PROCEDURES OF GENDER TRANSITION (ANALYTICAL REVIEW)

Y. Kirey-Sitnikova
{"title":"SOCIAL FACTORS IN THE DESIGN OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDICAL PROCEDURES OF GENDER TRANSITION (ANALYTICAL REVIEW)","authors":"Y. Kirey-Sitnikova","doi":"10.21045/2071-5021-2021-67-6-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance. Medical procedures of gender transition are aimed at modifying primary and secondary sex characteristics. Effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition in reduction of gender dysphoria, improvement of health-related quality of life and psycho-social outcomes attracts attention of a growing number of researchers. However, many authors emphasize poor quality of data explained by the complex nature of gender transition that involves medical, social and legal dimensions. Taking account of non-medical (social) factors when conducting epidemiological studies is necessary to obtain more reliable data on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition, which is important, among other reasons, for the development of clinical practice guidelines on gender dysphoria rooted in evidence-based medicine. Purpose. Identify social factors affecting the quality of studies on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition and give recommendations for the design of future epidemiological studies. Material and methods. A systematic search of systematic reviews on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The discovered reviews and underlying studies were analyzed in order to identify limitations in their design, especially related to the influence of social factors. In addition, an analysis of publications in journals Transgender Studies Quarterly, International Journal of Transgender Health and Transgender Health was conducted to identify social factors that affect the effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition. Results. Among the main limitations affecting the quality of epidemiological studies on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition are: (a) difficulties of establishing the number of trans people; (b) no consensus on drawing a sample; (c) individual medical needs of trans people; (d) non-linearity and non-chrononormativity of gender transition; (e) poor understanding of social pathways affecting psycho-social outcomes for trans people.","PeriodicalId":279998,"journal":{"name":"Social Aspects of Population Health","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Aspects of Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2021-67-6-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Significance. Medical procedures of gender transition are aimed at modifying primary and secondary sex characteristics. Effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition in reduction of gender dysphoria, improvement of health-related quality of life and psycho-social outcomes attracts attention of a growing number of researchers. However, many authors emphasize poor quality of data explained by the complex nature of gender transition that involves medical, social and legal dimensions. Taking account of non-medical (social) factors when conducting epidemiological studies is necessary to obtain more reliable data on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition, which is important, among other reasons, for the development of clinical practice guidelines on gender dysphoria rooted in evidence-based medicine. Purpose. Identify social factors affecting the quality of studies on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition and give recommendations for the design of future epidemiological studies. Material and methods. A systematic search of systematic reviews on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The discovered reviews and underlying studies were analyzed in order to identify limitations in their design, especially related to the influence of social factors. In addition, an analysis of publications in journals Transgender Studies Quarterly, International Journal of Transgender Health and Transgender Health was conducted to identify social factors that affect the effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition. Results. Among the main limitations affecting the quality of epidemiological studies on effectiveness of medical procedures of gender transition are: (a) difficulties of establishing the number of trans people; (b) no consensus on drawing a sample; (c) individual medical needs of trans people; (d) non-linearity and non-chrononormativity of gender transition; (e) poor understanding of social pathways affecting psycho-social outcomes for trans people.
性别转换医疗程序有效性流行病学研究设计中的社会因素(分析性审查)
的意义。性别转换的医疗程序旨在改变第一和第二性征。性别转换医疗程序在减少性别焦虑、改善健康相关生活质量和社会心理结果方面的有效性受到越来越多研究者的关注。然而,许多作者强调,由于性别过渡涉及医疗、社会和法律层面的复杂性,数据质量很差。在进行流行病学研究时,必须考虑到非医疗(社会)因素,以便获得关于性别转换医疗程序有效性的更可靠数据,这对于制定基于循证医学的性别焦虑症临床实践指南非常重要。目的。确定影响性别转换医疗程序有效性研究质量的社会因素,并为今后流行病学研究的设计提出建议。材料和方法。在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus中对性别转换医疗程序有效性的系统评价进行了系统搜索。对发现的综述和基础研究进行分析,以确定其设计的局限性,特别是与社会因素的影响有关的局限性。此外,还对《跨性别研究季刊》、《国际跨性别健康期刊》和《跨性别健康期刊》上的出版物进行了分析,以确定影响性别转换医疗程序有效性的社会因素。结果。影响关于变性医疗程序有效性的流行病学研究质量的主要限制包括:(a)难以确定变性人的数量;(b)对抽取样本没有一致意见;跨性别者的个人医疗需要;(d)性别转变的非线性和非时代性;(e)对影响跨性别者心理社会结果的社会途径理解不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信