Experienced vs Inexperienced Disabled Swimmers: Training Load and Recovery in Preparation Period

K. Ashadi, O. Handayani, H. Setijono, Tri Rustiadi, Sugiharto, Soegiyanto
{"title":"Experienced vs Inexperienced Disabled Swimmers: Training Load and Recovery in Preparation Period","authors":"K. Ashadi, O. Handayani, H. Setijono, Tri Rustiadi, Sugiharto, Soegiyanto","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study purpose was to analyse the training load and recovery of experienced and inexperienced swimmers with disabilities.\nMaterials and methods. The study subjects consisted of seven swimming athletes with disabilities at the provincial level who underwent training camps in preparation for the Indonesia Paralympics Games. The groups of athletes were divided based on their level of training and experience in national championships. For thirteen weeks, the athletes monitored their training load and recovery rate. Borg CR-10 was used to measure the internal training load, while the athlete’s recovery rate was measured using Total Quality Recovery (TQR). IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used to analyse normality and test differences between the two groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the significance of the RPE Borg CR-10, while the unpaired T-test was used to test the significance of the TQR.\nResults. The Borg CR-10 mean for the experienced athlete group was 7.78±0.47, while it was 8.28±0.56 (p<0.05) for the inexperienced athlete group. The RPE mean for the experienced athlete group was 18.24±1.47, while it was 18.52±1.57 (p>0.05) for the inexperienced athlete group. Furthermore, the Borg RPE shows the training load of experienced athletes of 17.12±1.03, which is lower than the average RPE of inexperienced athletes of 18.21±1.24, and also the TQR average of experienced athletes was of 18.24±1.47, while it was of 18.52 ±1.55 (p<0.05) in case of inexperienced athletes.\nConclusions. Experienced para-swimmers had a significantly different training load than inexperienced para-athletes. In addition, the training load of experienced para athletes was also significantly different compared to the recovery rates of experienced and inexperienced para swimmers.","PeriodicalId":178000,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study purpose was to analyse the training load and recovery of experienced and inexperienced swimmers with disabilities. Materials and methods. The study subjects consisted of seven swimming athletes with disabilities at the provincial level who underwent training camps in preparation for the Indonesia Paralympics Games. The groups of athletes were divided based on their level of training and experience in national championships. For thirteen weeks, the athletes monitored their training load and recovery rate. Borg CR-10 was used to measure the internal training load, while the athlete’s recovery rate was measured using Total Quality Recovery (TQR). IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used to analyse normality and test differences between the two groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test the significance of the RPE Borg CR-10, while the unpaired T-test was used to test the significance of the TQR. Results. The Borg CR-10 mean for the experienced athlete group was 7.78±0.47, while it was 8.28±0.56 (p<0.05) for the inexperienced athlete group. The RPE mean for the experienced athlete group was 18.24±1.47, while it was 18.52±1.57 (p>0.05) for the inexperienced athlete group. Furthermore, the Borg RPE shows the training load of experienced athletes of 17.12±1.03, which is lower than the average RPE of inexperienced athletes of 18.21±1.24, and also the TQR average of experienced athletes was of 18.24±1.47, while it was of 18.52 ±1.55 (p<0.05) in case of inexperienced athletes. Conclusions. Experienced para-swimmers had a significantly different training load than inexperienced para-athletes. In addition, the training load of experienced para athletes was also significantly different compared to the recovery rates of experienced and inexperienced para swimmers.
有经验和没有经验的残疾游泳运动员:训练负荷和准备阶段的恢复
研究的目的是分析有经验和没有经验的残疾游泳运动员的训练负荷和恢复情况。材料和方法。研究对象为7名省级残疾游泳运动员,他们为准备印度尼西亚残奥会而接受了训练营。这些运动员是根据他们的训练水平和参加全国锦标赛的经验进行分组的。在13周的时间里,运动员监测他们的训练负荷和恢复速度。使用Borg CR-10测量内部训练负荷,而使用Total Quality recovery (TQR)测量运动员的恢复率。采用IBM SPSS Statistics version 22进行正态性分析,检验两组间的差异。采用Mann-Whitney检验RPE Borg CR-10的显著性,采用unpaired t检验tqr结果的显著性。经验运动员组的Borg CR-10平均值为7.78±0.47,经验运动员组为8.28±0.56 (p0.05)。此外,Borg RPE显示经验丰富运动员的训练负荷为17.12±1.03,低于经验不足运动员的平均RPE(18.21±1.24);经验丰富运动员的TQR平均值为18.24±1.47,而经验不足运动员的TQR平均值为18.52±1.55 (p<0.05)。有经验的准游泳运动员与没有经验的准游泳运动员的训练负荷有显著差异。此外,经验丰富的残疾人运动员的训练负荷与经验丰富和经验不足的残疾人游泳运动员的恢复速度也有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信