{"title":"The Evidence on Globalization","authors":"N. Potrafke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2425513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globalization is blamed for many socio-economic shortcomings. I discuss the consequences of globalization by surveying the empirical globalization literature. My focus is on the KOF indices of globalization (Dreher 2006a and Dreher et al. 2008a), that have been used in more than 100 studies. Early studies using the KOF index reported correlations between globalization and several outcome variables. Studies published more recently identify causal effects. The evidence shows that globalization has spurred economic growth, promoted gender equality, and improved human rights. Moreover, globalization did not erode welfare state activities, did not have any significant effect on labor market interaction and hardly influenced market deregulation. It increased however within-country income inequality. The consequences of globalization thus turn out to be overall much more favorable than often conjectured in the public discourse.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2425513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63
Abstract
Globalization is blamed for many socio-economic shortcomings. I discuss the consequences of globalization by surveying the empirical globalization literature. My focus is on the KOF indices of globalization (Dreher 2006a and Dreher et al. 2008a), that have been used in more than 100 studies. Early studies using the KOF index reported correlations between globalization and several outcome variables. Studies published more recently identify causal effects. The evidence shows that globalization has spurred economic growth, promoted gender equality, and improved human rights. Moreover, globalization did not erode welfare state activities, did not have any significant effect on labor market interaction and hardly influenced market deregulation. It increased however within-country income inequality. The consequences of globalization thus turn out to be overall much more favorable than often conjectured in the public discourse.
许多社会经济问题都归咎于全球化。我通过调查实证全球化文献来讨论全球化的后果。我的重点是全球化的KOF指数(Dreher 2006a和Dreher et al. 2008a),该指数已在100多项研究中使用。使用KOF指数的早期研究报告了全球化与几个结果变量之间的相关性。最近发表的研究确定了因果关系。事实证明,全球化促进了经济增长,促进了性别平等,改善了人权。此外,全球化并没有削弱福利国家的活动,对劳动力市场的互动没有任何显著影响,也几乎没有影响市场放松管制。然而,它加剧了国家内部的收入不平等。因此,全球化的结果总体上比公众话语中经常猜测的要有利得多。