Taxing Loan Intermediary Services: A Comparative Study of India, Argentina & China

Kshitija Jadhav, Prof. Dr. Vaibhav Sonule, Prof. Lasya Vyakaranam
{"title":"Taxing Loan Intermediary Services: A Comparative Study of India, Argentina & China","authors":"Kshitija Jadhav, Prof. Dr. Vaibhav Sonule, Prof. Lasya Vyakaranam","doi":"10.56025/ijaresm.2022.108783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India witnessed a paradigm shift in the form of “Goods and Services Tax (GST)” in 2017. This GST regime has converted earlier unorganized commercial market in India into a unified market. Financial services constitute an important and large economic sector and the application of GST to financial services is particularly complex and has given rise to a multitude of problems and selective solutions.The difficulties of taxing financial services are well known among specialist academics and policy-makers; absent is an overview of the problems and possible solutions in a single, comparative study. It involves study of GST/VAT applicable in various countries including India, Australia and New Zealand and it aims at identifying the similarities as well as differences amongst themselves in terms of legal, compliance as well as administrative framework.Also Out of all the aims, to overcome the cascading effects of taxes and a seamless flow of credit of tax paid were crucial.After analysis it has been observed that the unique taxation system of zero-rating is suitable method amongst all other alternative method of taxation of banking and financial services. But out of all, even zero-rating method has its limitations. So, the strong anti-avoidance policy along with zero-rating method is needed to be implemented.","PeriodicalId":365321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of All Research Education & Scientific Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56025/ijaresm.2022.108783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India witnessed a paradigm shift in the form of “Goods and Services Tax (GST)” in 2017. This GST regime has converted earlier unorganized commercial market in India into a unified market. Financial services constitute an important and large economic sector and the application of GST to financial services is particularly complex and has given rise to a multitude of problems and selective solutions.The difficulties of taxing financial services are well known among specialist academics and policy-makers; absent is an overview of the problems and possible solutions in a single, comparative study. It involves study of GST/VAT applicable in various countries including India, Australia and New Zealand and it aims at identifying the similarities as well as differences amongst themselves in terms of legal, compliance as well as administrative framework.Also Out of all the aims, to overcome the cascading effects of taxes and a seamless flow of credit of tax paid were crucial.After analysis it has been observed that the unique taxation system of zero-rating is suitable method amongst all other alternative method of taxation of banking and financial services. But out of all, even zero-rating method has its limitations. So, the strong anti-avoidance policy along with zero-rating method is needed to be implemented.
税收贷款中介服务:印度、阿根廷和中国的比较研究
2017年,印度以“商品和服务税”(GST)的形式见证了范式转变。这种商品及服务税制度将印度早期无组织的商业市场转变为一个统一的市场。金融服务构成了一个重要而庞大的经济部门,商品及服务税在金融服务中的应用特别复杂,并产生了许多问题和选择性的解决方案。对金融服务征税的困难在专业学者和政策制定者中是众所周知的;缺少对单个比较研究中存在的问题和可能解决方案的概述。它涉及对包括印度、澳大利亚和新西兰在内的各个国家适用的商品及服务税/增值税的研究,旨在确定它们之间在法律、合规和行政框架方面的异同。此外,在所有目标中,克服税收的级联效应和实现税收抵免的无缝流动至关重要。经过分析,已经观察到,在所有其他替代的银行和金融服务征税方法中,零评级的独特税收制度是合适的方法。但最重要的是,即使是零评级方法也有其局限性。因此,需要实施强反规避策略和零评级方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信