An Evaluation of Master of Engineering Program in Construction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology
{"title":"An Evaluation of Master of Engineering Program in Construction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology","authors":"Kanitsara Punpanit, Boonsri Prommapun, Thip-anong Luanpukawat","doi":"10.55766/cpmo8975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this research were to evaluate (1) the context including objectives and structure of the program, (2) the input of the program, (3) the process of the program, and (4) the output of the Master of Engineering Program in Construction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology. The research sample totaling 221 persons comprised (1) eight members of the Program Review Committee, (2) six instructors, (3) 88 students, (4) 58 graduates, (5) 58 supervisors of the graduates, and (6) 3 experts. A questionnaire was employed as the research instrument. Research data were analyzed using the percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis. The findings of this research on evaluation of the Master of Engineering Program inConstruction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology revealed that all ofthe four components of the program, namely, the context, input, process, and output were appropriate at the high level. Thus, the evaluation results in all components ofthe program met the set criteria.","PeriodicalId":145995,"journal":{"name":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suranaree Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55766/cpmo8975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to evaluate (1) the context including objectives and structure of the program, (2) the input of the program, (3) the process of the program, and (4) the output of the Master of Engineering Program in Construction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology. The research sample totaling 221 persons comprised (1) eight members of the Program Review Committee, (2) six instructors, (3) 88 students, (4) 58 graduates, (5) 58 supervisors of the graduates, and (6) 3 experts. A questionnaire was employed as the research instrument. Research data were analyzed using the percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis. The findings of this research on evaluation of the Master of Engineering Program inConstruction and Infrastructure Management (Revised Program, B.E. 2555) of the Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology revealed that all ofthe four components of the program, namely, the context, input, process, and output were appropriate at the high level. Thus, the evaluation results in all components ofthe program met the set criteria.