Care Managers as Research Interviewers: A Test of a Strategy for Gathering Consumer Satisfaction Information

L. D. Murdoch, S. Kunkel, R. Applebaum, J. Straker
{"title":"Care Managers as Research Interviewers: A Test of a Strategy for Gathering Consumer Satisfaction Information","authors":"L. D. Murdoch, S. Kunkel, R. Applebaum, J. Straker","doi":"10.1177/0733464804267971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Care managers from local Area Agencies on Aging, operating Ohio’s home- and community based waiver program (PASSPORT), were trained as research interviewers to collect consumer satisfaction data from clients receiving in-home services using the Home Care Satisfaction Measure (Geron, Smith, Tennstedt, Jette, Chassler, & Kasten, 2000). The data for homemaker and home health aide scales were comparable to those collected by independent research interviewers for interrater reliability and showed no significant difference between the two groups. The scores on the home-delivered meals index obtained by care managers were slightly but significantly higher than those obtained by the research interviewers. A slight, but significant, difference was found on the home-delivered meals index, although differences between most individual items were not significant. Overall, findings indicate that care managers, when appropriately trained, can collect reliable, scientifically sound data, providing a cost-effective method for collecting satisfaction information from consumers receiving in-home care.","PeriodicalId":220319,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464804267971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Care managers from local Area Agencies on Aging, operating Ohio’s home- and community based waiver program (PASSPORT), were trained as research interviewers to collect consumer satisfaction data from clients receiving in-home services using the Home Care Satisfaction Measure (Geron, Smith, Tennstedt, Jette, Chassler, & Kasten, 2000). The data for homemaker and home health aide scales were comparable to those collected by independent research interviewers for interrater reliability and showed no significant difference between the two groups. The scores on the home-delivered meals index obtained by care managers were slightly but significantly higher than those obtained by the research interviewers. A slight, but significant, difference was found on the home-delivered meals index, although differences between most individual items were not significant. Overall, findings indicate that care managers, when appropriately trained, can collect reliable, scientifically sound data, providing a cost-effective method for collecting satisfaction information from consumers receiving in-home care.
护理经理作为研究采访者:收集消费者满意度信息策略的测试
负责俄亥俄州家庭和社区豁免计划(PASSPORT)的地方老龄机构的护理经理被培训为研究采访者,使用家庭护理满意度测量法从接受家庭服务的客户那里收集消费者满意度数据(Geron, Smith, Tennstedt, Jette, Chassler, & Kasten, 2000)。家庭主妇和家庭保健助理量表的数据与独立研究访谈者收集的数据具有可比性,两组之间没有显着差异。护理经理获得的上门送餐指数得分略高于研究采访者获得的得分,但显著高于采访者获得的得分。尽管大多数单独项目之间的差异并不显著,但在家送餐指数上发现了轻微但显著的差异。总体而言,研究结果表明,护理管理人员经过适当培训后,可以收集可靠、科学合理的数据,为收集接受家庭护理的消费者满意度信息提供了一种具有成本效益的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信