The efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency stimulation of the glenohumeral joint and suprascapular nerve for chronic shoulder pain and function compared to physiotherapy and exercise program without pain management

Aet Ristmägi, Olli Jauhiainen, Sanna Suominen, H. Heikkilä
{"title":"The efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency stimulation of the glenohumeral joint and suprascapular nerve for chronic shoulder pain and function compared to physiotherapy and exercise program without pain management","authors":"Aet Ristmägi, Olli Jauhiainen, Sanna Suominen, H. Heikkilä","doi":"10.33425/2768-4598.1008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Degenerative tendon diseases are primarily treated conservatively in primary health care and the most important treatment modality is physiotherapy-guided therapeutic rehabilitation. Method: In this prospective observational study, we investigated the effect of two different treatment approaches in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Physiotherapy-guided treatment was compared to interventional pain treatment with radiofrequency nerve stimulation (pRF) before exercise therapy. The primary outcomes were active shoulder mobility and shoulder function assessed by SPADI questionnaire at two and 6-month controls. Results: The results of this study show that pRF treatment combined to physiotherapy seem to effect shoulder function more than physiotherapy alone. With regard to patients with chronic pain and decreased shoulder mobility (65%), pRF treatment showed a significant greater effect in relieving pain and increasing functional outcome assessed by SPADI. Also short-term pain and impairment reduction for 8-12 weeks occurred in patients with chronic rotator cuff lesions. A direct comparison between the rehabilitation programs strengthened the assumption that effective pain management could be necessary to obtain optimal effect of physiotherapy and physical training in patients with chronic (> 3 months) shoulder pain. Conclusion: PRF can be performed in an outpatient department and provides the clinician with an alternative or additional approach to oral drug treatment and intra-articular injection. Further, it may prove to be a useful treatment for patients who are unfit or unwilling to consider surgical intervention Level of evidence: IV.","PeriodicalId":371381,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Trials","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-4598.1008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Degenerative tendon diseases are primarily treated conservatively in primary health care and the most important treatment modality is physiotherapy-guided therapeutic rehabilitation. Method: In this prospective observational study, we investigated the effect of two different treatment approaches in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Physiotherapy-guided treatment was compared to interventional pain treatment with radiofrequency nerve stimulation (pRF) before exercise therapy. The primary outcomes were active shoulder mobility and shoulder function assessed by SPADI questionnaire at two and 6-month controls. Results: The results of this study show that pRF treatment combined to physiotherapy seem to effect shoulder function more than physiotherapy alone. With regard to patients with chronic pain and decreased shoulder mobility (65%), pRF treatment showed a significant greater effect in relieving pain and increasing functional outcome assessed by SPADI. Also short-term pain and impairment reduction for 8-12 weeks occurred in patients with chronic rotator cuff lesions. A direct comparison between the rehabilitation programs strengthened the assumption that effective pain management could be necessary to obtain optimal effect of physiotherapy and physical training in patients with chronic (> 3 months) shoulder pain. Conclusion: PRF can be performed in an outpatient department and provides the clinician with an alternative or additional approach to oral drug treatment and intra-articular injection. Further, it may prove to be a useful treatment for patients who are unfit or unwilling to consider surgical intervention Level of evidence: IV.
脉冲射频刺激肩胛关节和肩胛上神经对慢性肩关节疼痛和功能的疗效与无疼痛管理的物理治疗和运动方案的比较
背景:退行性肌腱疾病在初级卫生保健中主要是保守治疗,最重要的治疗方式是物理治疗引导的治疗性康复。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们研究了两种不同的治疗方法对慢性肩痛患者的影响。将物理治疗引导治疗与运动治疗前射频神经刺激(pRF)介入疼痛治疗进行比较。在2个月和6个月的对照中,主要结果是肩关节活动度和肩关节功能通过SPADI问卷评估。结果:本研究结果表明,pRF联合物理治疗似乎比单独物理治疗更能影响肩功能。对于慢性疼痛和肩部活动能力下降的患者(65%),pRF治疗在缓解疼痛和增加SPADI评估的功能结局方面显示出显著更大的效果。慢性肩袖病变患者也出现8-12周的短期疼痛和损伤减轻。康复方案之间的直接比较强化了这样的假设,即有效的疼痛管理对于慢性(> 3个月)肩痛患者获得最佳的物理治疗和体育训练是必要的。结论:PRF可以在门诊进行,为临床医生提供了口服药物治疗和关节内注射的一种替代或额外的方法。此外,对于不适合或不愿考虑手术干预的患者,它可能是一种有用的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信