THE CHALLENGE OF ANTHROPOLOGY AS HUMANITARIAN SCIENCE IN THE ETERNAL SEARCH OF ORIGINALITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL DIFFERENCE AND THE SOCIETAL OTHERNESS

N. Gousgounis
{"title":"THE CHALLENGE OF ANTHROPOLOGY AS HUMANITARIAN SCIENCE IN THE ETERNAL SEARCH OF ORIGINALITY BETWEEN THE CULTURAL DIFFERENCE AND THE SOCIETAL OTHERNESS","authors":"N. Gousgounis","doi":"10.47509/scdi.2022.v02i01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time anthropology was defined by the exoticism of its subject matter and also by the distance (mostly cultural than geographic) separating the researcher from the researched group. However, after the coming of the new Millennium many things have been changed radically and many anthropologists imply their old professional ethnographic techniques to study their own cultures using terms as otherness instead of exoticism and reflexivity instead of objectivity. The term of cosmopolitanism also has been too much applied instead of multiculturalism, charged with political connotations of what could be ‘politically correct’ under the western values. In the same time, anthropology is exercised now also by the representatives of these ‘ different cultures’ who exercise by their original ways the inverse influence to the western values. Cultural difference has acquired its most complex meaning nowadays and the scope of this paper is to present through the example of tourism some cases of intercultural meetings under a paradigmatic assumption entailing not only anthropological self-criticism but also the consideration that this self-criticism anthropology prescribes is also morally and originally pointed. Social change has to be analysed objectively and in the same time from all points of view and this consists the challenge of anthropology in our era.","PeriodicalId":378976,"journal":{"name":"SOCIETY AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA","volume":"732 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOCIETY AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47509/scdi.2022.v02i01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time anthropology was defined by the exoticism of its subject matter and also by the distance (mostly cultural than geographic) separating the researcher from the researched group. However, after the coming of the new Millennium many things have been changed radically and many anthropologists imply their old professional ethnographic techniques to study their own cultures using terms as otherness instead of exoticism and reflexivity instead of objectivity. The term of cosmopolitanism also has been too much applied instead of multiculturalism, charged with political connotations of what could be ‘politically correct’ under the western values. In the same time, anthropology is exercised now also by the representatives of these ‘ different cultures’ who exercise by their original ways the inverse influence to the western values. Cultural difference has acquired its most complex meaning nowadays and the scope of this paper is to present through the example of tourism some cases of intercultural meetings under a paradigmatic assumption entailing not only anthropological self-criticism but also the consideration that this self-criticism anthropology prescribes is also morally and originally pointed. Social change has to be analysed objectively and in the same time from all points of view and this consists the challenge of anthropology in our era.
作为人文科学的人类学在文化差异和社会他者之间永恒地寻找原创性的挑战
长期以来,人类学被定义为其研究对象的异国情调,以及研究者与被研究群体之间的距离(主要是文化上的距离,而不是地理上的距离)。然而,在新千年到来之后,许多事情发生了根本性的变化,许多人类学家使用他们旧的专业民族志技术来研究他们自己的文化,使用“他者性”而不是“异域性”,“反身性”而不是“客观性”。“世界主义”一词也被过度使用,而不是多元文化主义,它被赋予了在西方价值观下什么是“政治正确”的政治内涵。与此同时,这些“不同文化”的代表现在也在运用人类学,他们以自己的原始方式对西方价值观施加相反的影响。文化差异在今天已经获得了最复杂的含义,本文的范围是通过旅游业的例子来呈现一些跨文化会议的案例,在一个范式假设下,不仅需要人类学的自我批评,而且需要考虑这种人类学规定的自我批评也是道德的和最初的。社会变迁必须同时客观地、从各个角度加以分析,这是我们这个时代人类学面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信