Comparing the switching performance of SiC MOSFET intrinsic body diode to additional SiC schottky diodes in SiC power modules

Daniel Martin, P. Killeen, W. A. Curbow, Brett Sparkman, Lauren E. Kegley, T. McNutt
{"title":"Comparing the switching performance of SiC MOSFET intrinsic body diode to additional SiC schottky diodes in SiC power modules","authors":"Daniel Martin, P. Killeen, W. A. Curbow, Brett Sparkman, Lauren E. Kegley, T. McNutt","doi":"10.1109/WIPDA.2016.7799946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison of the inductive switching losses between a 1200 V SiC MOSFET half bridge power module with anti-parallel SiC schottky barrier diodes (SBD) versus the same power module package utilizing only the intrinsic body diode of the SiC MOSFETs. SBDs can significantly reduce switching losses by reducing the reverse recovery losses experienced during hard-switching events. However, the inclusion of SBDs reduces the chip area available in the module for MOSFETs — thus limiting the current capability of the end product and increasing the cost per amp. This paper investigates the tradeoff between using both SiC MOSFETs and SBDs versus using only SiC MOSFETs in a high performance SiC power module. Understanding the switching performace of each configuration will enable customized power module solutions optimized to maximize performance of the desired application.","PeriodicalId":431347,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 4th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 4th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WIPDA.2016.7799946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the inductive switching losses between a 1200 V SiC MOSFET half bridge power module with anti-parallel SiC schottky barrier diodes (SBD) versus the same power module package utilizing only the intrinsic body diode of the SiC MOSFETs. SBDs can significantly reduce switching losses by reducing the reverse recovery losses experienced during hard-switching events. However, the inclusion of SBDs reduces the chip area available in the module for MOSFETs — thus limiting the current capability of the end product and increasing the cost per amp. This paper investigates the tradeoff between using both SiC MOSFETs and SBDs versus using only SiC MOSFETs in a high performance SiC power module. Understanding the switching performace of each configuration will enable customized power module solutions optimized to maximize performance of the desired application.
比较SiC功率模块中SiC MOSFET本构体二极管与附加SiC肖特基二极管的开关性能
本文比较了采用反并联SiC肖特基势垒二极管(SBD)的1200v SiC MOSFET半桥功率模块与仅采用SiC MOSFET固有体二极管的相同功率模块封装之间的感应开关损耗。sdd可以通过减少在硬切换事件中经历的反向恢复损失来显著降低切换损失。然而,sdd的加入减少了mosfet模块中可用的芯片面积,从而限制了最终产品的电流能力并增加了每安培的成本。本文研究了在高性能SiC功率模块中使用SiC mosfet和sdd与仅使用SiC mosfet之间的权衡。了解每种配置的交换性能将使定制的电源模块解决方案得到优化,从而最大限度地提高所需应用的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信