AN IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION ON COMPETITION POLICY: WORLD’S PRACTICE AND UKRAINE

V. Kolosha
{"title":"AN IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION ON COMPETITION POLICY: WORLD’S PRACTICE AND UKRAINE","authors":"V. Kolosha","doi":"10.17721/tppe.2019.39.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines an impact of digitalization on modern competition policy. Author proves that a necessity to modify traditional instruments of competition policy is caused by such special features of economic rivalry at the digital markets as significant return on scale, network effects and growing importance of data.\n\nAuthor argues that competition authorities face challenges caused by digitalization at the almost all stages of determining of firm’s dominant position, especially in the case of determining of relevant market, its participants and estimation of their market share. Special issues of the activity of digital platforms as a key competition subjects at modern markets are analyzed. Author proves that in the most cases it is appropriate to consider each side of the platform as a separate market when the relevant market is determined. Determination of a single market of intermediation services is justified only if the single price is set for all platform clients and if there is the same degree of substitution of the services for each consumer group.\n\nThe article shows that it is necessary to consider positive cross-group effect when SSNІP-test is used for economic analysis of digital platforms activity. The problems of evaluation of business platforms market share are exposed. Author argues that usage of revenues as a basis for market share calculation is not appropriate if platform sets zero-price. In this case market share should be calculated based on the number of user or intensity of usage. It is proven that the main criterion of competition policy efficiency – consumer welfare – should include not only the price but also such parameters as privacy, consumer choice, protection of personal data, switching costs.\n\nA necessity of modification of Ukrainian competition policy in response to challenges of digital era is proven.","PeriodicalId":200033,"journal":{"name":"THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ISSUES OF ECONOMICS","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ISSUES OF ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/tppe.2019.39.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines an impact of digitalization on modern competition policy. Author proves that a necessity to modify traditional instruments of competition policy is caused by such special features of economic rivalry at the digital markets as significant return on scale, network effects and growing importance of data. Author argues that competition authorities face challenges caused by digitalization at the almost all stages of determining of firm’s dominant position, especially in the case of determining of relevant market, its participants and estimation of their market share. Special issues of the activity of digital platforms as a key competition subjects at modern markets are analyzed. Author proves that in the most cases it is appropriate to consider each side of the platform as a separate market when the relevant market is determined. Determination of a single market of intermediation services is justified only if the single price is set for all platform clients and if there is the same degree of substitution of the services for each consumer group. The article shows that it is necessary to consider positive cross-group effect when SSNІP-test is used for economic analysis of digital platforms activity. The problems of evaluation of business platforms market share are exposed. Author argues that usage of revenues as a basis for market share calculation is not appropriate if platform sets zero-price. In this case market share should be calculated based on the number of user or intensity of usage. It is proven that the main criterion of competition policy efficiency – consumer welfare – should include not only the price but also such parameters as privacy, consumer choice, protection of personal data, switching costs. A necessity of modification of Ukrainian competition policy in response to challenges of digital era is proven.
数字化对竞争政策的影响:世界实践与乌克兰
本文探讨了数字化对现代竞争政策的影响。作者证明,数字市场经济竞争的特殊特征,如显著的规模回报、网络效应和数据的重要性日益增加,导致了修改传统竞争政策工具的必要性。笔者认为,竞争管理机构在确定企业支配地位的几乎所有阶段都面临数字化带来的挑战,特别是在确定相关市场、市场参与者和市场份额的情况下。分析了数字平台作为现代市场竞争主体的特殊问题。作者证明,在大多数情况下,当相关市场确定时,将平台的每一方视为一个单独的市场是合适的。只有为所有平台客户设定单一价格,并且服务对每个消费者群体具有相同程度的替代,才有理由确定单一中介服务市场。本文表明,在使用SSNІP-test对数字平台活动进行经济分析时,有必要考虑正向的跨群体效应。暴露了商业平台市场份额评估的问题。作者认为,如果平台设置零价格,使用收入作为市场份额计算的基础是不合适的。在这种情况下,市场份额应该根据用户数量或使用强度来计算。证明了竞争政策效率的主要标准——消费者福利——不仅应包括价格,还应包括隐私、消费者选择、个人数据保护、转换成本等参数。为了应对数字时代的挑战,修改乌克兰竞争政策的必要性得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信