Accessibility and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage: Examples of Best Practices in Europe

R. Genovese
{"title":"Accessibility and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage: Examples of Best Practices in Europe","authors":"R. Genovese","doi":"10.35784/odk.2953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Premise. The essay will report on actions promoted at international and national level, to ensure accessibility in different sectors of social life and reduce obstacles in this field in European regulations and in the practices of Member States. \nThe Convention adopted by UNO in 2006, stating that people with different abilities must enjoy fundamental rights and (political, economic, social, cultural) freedoms, constitutes the first great treaty of the twenty-first century concerning the change in attitude and strategies towards people bearing handicaps, to increase respect of their dignity through every possible measure. \nIntercultural dialogue. In light of a greater awareness on environmental issues and possible solutions, we are, therefore, all called upon to contribute to changes in the relation with our one and only Planet in order to build a new conservation ethics, which may include the values of Cultural Heritage and accept, for its protection and enhancement, the contribution of Communities, favouring intercultural dialogue. \nBest practices. The essay intends to stress the importance of integrated policies in promoting accessibility and the enhancement of cultural heritage, also through the examination of the best practices implemented in different European Countries. Specifically, it shall highlight how one of the criteria informing the Management Plan of the ‘Archaeological Area of Pompeii and Torre del Greco’ is based on the conservation of the archaeological heritage, with the purpose of making it accessible to the public while conserving the testimonial, formal and material features of the site, and addressing conservation issues as well as the design quality of accessibility improvements. \nIntegrated Conservation. The quality of conservation and restoration interventions on cultural heritage will, therefore, have to be perfected through an aware fact-finding analysis, favouring the application of scientific and digital technologies, paired with a diagnostic approach capable of including the digitalisation of processes, energy efficiency, accessibility, leading to the digital management of anamnesis and control of the restoration project, based on adequate knowledge of the cultural property and its state of conservation.","PeriodicalId":273645,"journal":{"name":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise. The essay will report on actions promoted at international and national level, to ensure accessibility in different sectors of social life and reduce obstacles in this field in European regulations and in the practices of Member States. The Convention adopted by UNO in 2006, stating that people with different abilities must enjoy fundamental rights and (political, economic, social, cultural) freedoms, constitutes the first great treaty of the twenty-first century concerning the change in attitude and strategies towards people bearing handicaps, to increase respect of their dignity through every possible measure. Intercultural dialogue. In light of a greater awareness on environmental issues and possible solutions, we are, therefore, all called upon to contribute to changes in the relation with our one and only Planet in order to build a new conservation ethics, which may include the values of Cultural Heritage and accept, for its protection and enhancement, the contribution of Communities, favouring intercultural dialogue. Best practices. The essay intends to stress the importance of integrated policies in promoting accessibility and the enhancement of cultural heritage, also through the examination of the best practices implemented in different European Countries. Specifically, it shall highlight how one of the criteria informing the Management Plan of the ‘Archaeological Area of Pompeii and Torre del Greco’ is based on the conservation of the archaeological heritage, with the purpose of making it accessible to the public while conserving the testimonial, formal and material features of the site, and addressing conservation issues as well as the design quality of accessibility improvements. Integrated Conservation. The quality of conservation and restoration interventions on cultural heritage will, therefore, have to be perfected through an aware fact-finding analysis, favouring the application of scientific and digital technologies, paired with a diagnostic approach capable of including the digitalisation of processes, energy efficiency, accessibility, leading to the digital management of anamnesis and control of the restoration project, based on adequate knowledge of the cultural property and its state of conservation.
文化遗产的可及性和加强:欧洲最佳实践的例子
前提。这篇文章将报告在国际和国家一级促进的行动,以确保社会生活不同部门的无障碍,并减少欧洲条例和会员国实践在这一领域的障碍。联合国组织于2006年通过的《公约》规定,不同能力的人必须享有基本权利和(政治、经济、社会、文化)自由,这是二十一世纪关于改变对残疾人的态度和战略,通过一切可能的措施增加对他们尊严的尊重的第一项重要条约。跨文化对话。因此,鉴于对环境问题和可能的解决办法的更大认识,我们都被呼吁为改变与我们唯一的星球的关系做出贡献,以建立一种新的保护伦理,其中可能包括文化遗产的价值,并接受社区的贡献,以保护和加强文化间的对话。最佳实践。本文旨在通过对不同欧洲国家实施的最佳实践的考察,强调综合政策在促进无障碍和加强文化遗产方面的重要性。具体来说,它将强调“庞贝和格雷戈塔考古区”管理计划的一个标准是如何建立在考古遗产保护的基础上的,目的是在保护遗址的证明、形式和物质特征的同时,使其向公众开放,并解决保护问题以及改善可达性的设计质量。综合保护。因此,必须通过有意识的事实调查分析来完善文化遗产保护和修复干预措施的质量,有利于科学和数字技术的应用,并结合能够包括流程数字化、能源效率、可达性在内的诊断方法,从而实现对修复项目的数字化管理和控制。基于对文化财产及其保护状况的充分了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信