Understanding the Poetry as a Complex Analytical and Synthetic Process of the Cognitive Sphere of the Personality

Inna Nohachevska, O. Hudyma
{"title":"Understanding the Poetry as a Complex Analytical and Synthetic Process of the Cognitive Sphere of the Personality","authors":"Inna Nohachevska, O. Hudyma","doi":"10.32626/2227-6246.2022-58.183-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the purpose of our research was to conduct an empirical study of the psy-chological characteristics of future philologists of contemporary poetry and to assess the development of personal qualities of students who are the part of the structure of reading competence and, in our opinion, will facilitate students’ un-derstanding of poetry to develop their ability to reflect their mental states, goals and speech-thinking competence, creative imagination, richness of associations, awareness of one’s own experiences, the ability to in-depth analysis and com-menting on poetry.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The experimental method was the method of organi-zing empirical research.the results of the research. It was proved thatthe most common reasons for the difficulty of understanding poetry had been: surreal poetics; postmodern poetics; original and unusual worldview; deliberate outrage; intellectual begin-ning; high symbolism of images; high subjectivity; complex philosophical load; accumulation of worlds; mental unusualness; intertextuality; experimentalism; complex, metaphoric imagery; associative multifacetedness of semantic series; complex subtexts; guidelines for the destruction of poetic form and providing ex-periments with it; presence of reminiscences; complex allusions; intuitive grasp of Ukrainian archaisms; speech experiments; outdated and complex vocabulary; unusually large proportion of obscene vocabulary; a large number of author’s innovations in poetry.conclusions. We interpret the understanding of the text as a complex ana-lytical-synthetic process, which ends with penetration into the deep semantics of some message. It was shown that understanding had taken a place on two levels – on informational-cognitive one and on the semantic level. We offer the criteria for understanding the content of the message, which are related to the processes of extracting and generating the meaning of the text. We proved, that the main criterion of understanding the poetry is the restoration of the meaning of the original message, the construction of its internal semantic structure, which is characterized by the criteria of depth and completeness of understanding.","PeriodicalId":250456,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-58.183-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the purpose of our research was to conduct an empirical study of the psy-chological characteristics of future philologists of contemporary poetry and to assess the development of personal qualities of students who are the part of the structure of reading competence and, in our opinion, will facilitate students’ un-derstanding of poetry to develop their ability to reflect their mental states, goals and speech-thinking competence, creative imagination, richness of associations, awareness of one’s own experiences, the ability to in-depth analysis and com-menting on poetry.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The experimental method was the method of organi-zing empirical research.the results of the research. It was proved thatthe most common reasons for the difficulty of understanding poetry had been: surreal poetics; postmodern poetics; original and unusual worldview; deliberate outrage; intellectual begin-ning; high symbolism of images; high subjectivity; complex philosophical load; accumulation of worlds; mental unusualness; intertextuality; experimentalism; complex, metaphoric imagery; associative multifacetedness of semantic series; complex subtexts; guidelines for the destruction of poetic form and providing ex-periments with it; presence of reminiscences; complex allusions; intuitive grasp of Ukrainian archaisms; speech experiments; outdated and complex vocabulary; unusually large proportion of obscene vocabulary; a large number of author’s innovations in poetry.conclusions. We interpret the understanding of the text as a complex ana-lytical-synthetic process, which ends with penetration into the deep semantics of some message. It was shown that understanding had taken a place on two levels – on informational-cognitive one and on the semantic level. We offer the criteria for understanding the content of the message, which are related to the processes of extracting and generating the meaning of the text. We proved, that the main criterion of understanding the poetry is the restoration of the meaning of the original message, the construction of its internal semantic structure, which is characterized by the criteria of depth and completeness of understanding.
把诗歌理解为人格认知领域的复杂分析和综合过程
我们的研究目的是对未来当代诗歌语言学家的心理特征进行实证研究,并评估学生个人素质的发展,这些素质是阅读能力结构的一部分,我们认为,这些素质将促进学生对诗歌的理解,从而发展他们反映心理状态、目标和言语思维能力、创造性想象力、丰富联想的能力。对自身经历的自觉,对诗歌的深入分析和评论能力。研究方法。本研究采用了以下理论方法来解决本文提出的任务:分类法、结构与功能法、分析法、系统化法、建模法、泛化法。实验方法是组织实证研究的方法。研究的结果。事实证明,诗歌理解困难最常见的原因是:超现实主义的诗学;后现代诗学;独特的世界观;深思熟虑的愤怒;知识的上限;形象的高度象征主义;高主体性;复杂的哲学负荷;世界的积累;精神色彩;互文性;经验主义;复杂的、隐喻性的意象;语义序列的联想多面性;复杂的潜台词;破坏诗歌形式的指导方针和提供实验;回忆的存在;复杂的典故;对乌克兰古语的直观把握;语音实验;过时和复杂的词汇;不寻常的大量淫秽词汇;作者在诗歌上的大量创新。我们认为对文本的理解是一个复杂的分析-分析-综合的过程,这个过程最终渗透到某些信息的深层语义中。结果表明,理解发生在信息认知层面和语义层面两个层面。我们提供了理解消息内容的标准,这些标准与提取和生成文本含义的过程有关。我们证明,理解诗歌的主要标准是恢复原信息的意义,构建其内部语义结构,其特征是理解的深度和完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信