Local Officials React to State Policy Innovation Tying Revenue Sharing to Dashboards and Incentive Funding

Thomas M. Ivacko, D. Horner, Michael Q. Crawford
{"title":"Local Officials React to State Policy Innovation Tying Revenue Sharing to Dashboards and Incentive Funding","authors":"Thomas M. Ivacko, D. Horner, Michael Q. Crawford","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2351896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2011, the state of Michigan implemented major policy changes in its statutory revenue sharing program, through which it distributes funding to a subset of Michigan’s 1,856 local governments. The new policy replaced formula-based funding with an incentive program that uses revenue sharing to foster local government reform. The new program, called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP), requires local governments to certify that they have met state-specified standards for \"best practices\" in three categories (accountability and transparency; intergovernmental collaboration; and employee compensation policies) in order to receive their full allotment of incentive-based funds. This report focuses on the first EVIP category (accountability and transparency) and examines how Michigan’s local governments are responding to the state’s incentive-driven push for local reform. The findings are based on statewide surveys of local government leaders in the Fall 2011 wave of the Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS).","PeriodicalId":122993,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2351896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

In 2011, the state of Michigan implemented major policy changes in its statutory revenue sharing program, through which it distributes funding to a subset of Michigan’s 1,856 local governments. The new policy replaced formula-based funding with an incentive program that uses revenue sharing to foster local government reform. The new program, called the Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP), requires local governments to certify that they have met state-specified standards for "best practices" in three categories (accountability and transparency; intergovernmental collaboration; and employee compensation policies) in order to receive their full allotment of incentive-based funds. This report focuses on the first EVIP category (accountability and transparency) and examines how Michigan’s local governments are responding to the state’s incentive-driven push for local reform. The findings are based on statewide surveys of local government leaders in the Fall 2011 wave of the Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS).
地方官员对将收入分享与仪表板和激励资金挂钩的国家政策创新的反应
2011年,密歇根州在其法定收入分享计划中实施了重大政策变化,通过该计划,该州将资金分配给密歇根州1856个地方政府中的一部分。新政策用一项激励计划取代了基于公式的资金,该计划利用收入分成来促进地方政府改革。这项名为“经济活力激励计划”(EVIP)的新计划要求地方政府证明它们在三个方面达到了国家规定的“最佳实践”标准(问责制和透明度;政府间合作;以及员工薪酬政策),以便获得他们的全额奖励基金。本报告侧重于第一个EVIP类别(问责制和透明度),并研究了密歇根州地方政府如何应对国家激励推动的地方改革。这些发现是基于2011年秋季密歇根公共政策调查(MPPS)对全州范围内地方政府领导人的调查得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信