Exploring ministries’ use of research in policymaking - knowledge stock, circulation, or routines?

T. Thune, Magnus Gulbrandsen, Ingvild Reymert, S. Tellmann
{"title":"Exploring ministries’ use of research in policymaking - knowledge stock, circulation, or routines?","authors":"T. Thune, Magnus Gulbrandsen, Ingvild Reymert, S. Tellmann","doi":"10.55835/6442e1ea4e3daf2fc8306960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the use of scientific knowledge in policy work as an organization-level phenomenon and draws on the absorptive capacity concept. Through an empirical study of 14 Norwegian ministries, we seek to understand how organizational characteristics and processes that may play a role for whether and how policy organisations use scientific knowledge in policy making. We make use of the distinction between potential and realized absorptive capacity, and we investigate the following issues: First, we explore whether the knowledge stocks of a government organization influence the propensity to acquire research. Second, we are interested in understanding if knowledge circulation activities influence the propensity to use research-based knowledge in government organizations. Finally, we will look at whether having specific organizational routines in place influences both knowledge acquisition and use in government organizations. Methodologically, we make a qualitative comparative analysis (Ragin, 1987; Rihoux and Ragin, 2012) of 14 ministries, based on both qualitative and quantitative data, including survey data from 1325 ministerial civil servants.","PeriodicalId":334841,"journal":{"name":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55835/6442e1ea4e3daf2fc8306960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the use of scientific knowledge in policy work as an organization-level phenomenon and draws on the absorptive capacity concept. Through an empirical study of 14 Norwegian ministries, we seek to understand how organizational characteristics and processes that may play a role for whether and how policy organisations use scientific knowledge in policy making. We make use of the distinction between potential and realized absorptive capacity, and we investigate the following issues: First, we explore whether the knowledge stocks of a government organization influence the propensity to acquire research. Second, we are interested in understanding if knowledge circulation activities influence the propensity to use research-based knowledge in government organizations. Finally, we will look at whether having specific organizational routines in place influences both knowledge acquisition and use in government organizations. Methodologically, we make a qualitative comparative analysis (Ragin, 1987; Rihoux and Ragin, 2012) of 14 ministries, based on both qualitative and quantitative data, including survey data from 1325 ministerial civil servants.
探索政府部门在政策制定中使用研究——知识储备、流通还是惯例?
本文将科学知识在政策工作中的运用作为一种组织层面的现象,并借鉴了吸收能力的概念。通过对挪威14个部委的实证研究,我们试图了解组织特征和过程如何在政策组织是否以及如何在政策制定中使用科学知识方面发挥作用。本文利用潜在吸收能力和已实现吸收能力的区别,研究了以下问题:首先,我们探讨了政府组织的知识储备是否会影响获取研究的倾向。其次,我们感兴趣的是了解知识流通活动是否会影响政府组织使用研究型知识的倾向。最后,我们将研究在政府组织中是否有特定的组织惯例会影响知识的获取和使用。在方法上,我们进行了定性比较分析(Ragin, 1987;Rihoux和Ragin, 2012)基于定性和定量数据,包括对1325名部级公务员的调查数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信