“Thus Spoke Proctor”: Nietzsche and the Overman in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible

Pouria Torkamaneh, A. Ghaderi
{"title":"“Thus Spoke Proctor”: Nietzsche and the Overman in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible","authors":"Pouria Torkamaneh, A. Ghaderi","doi":"10.28914/ATLANTIS-2018-40.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953) through a Nietzschean critique. In fact, Miller’s play presents a leading character whose individuality and interaction with his community, in terms of theology and politics, demands a re-evaluation of all values, much akin to the way Friedrich Nietzsche famously did in nineteenth-century Europe. To explore the possible connections between the two, first, Nietzsche’s idea about Christianity is discussed in comparison to Proctor’s treatment of religion in the play. Both Nietzsche and Miller deconstruct the self-celebrating fanaticism of their respective communities by their vitriolic attacks on individual moral standards and the introduction of an Ubermensch [“Overman”] as a glorious model of human virtues. Therefore, second, this work will demonstrate how Nietzsche’s Ubermensch can offer a fitting paradigm to consider Proctor’s rebellion against the established Church. And third, Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence is used to further illuminate Proctor’s view of life. Keywords: Arthur Miller; The Crucible; Friedrich Nietzsche; Ubermensch / Overman; Christianity; eternal recurrence","PeriodicalId":172515,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28914/ATLANTIS-2018-40.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyzes Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953) through a Nietzschean critique. In fact, Miller’s play presents a leading character whose individuality and interaction with his community, in terms of theology and politics, demands a re-evaluation of all values, much akin to the way Friedrich Nietzsche famously did in nineteenth-century Europe. To explore the possible connections between the two, first, Nietzsche’s idea about Christianity is discussed in comparison to Proctor’s treatment of religion in the play. Both Nietzsche and Miller deconstruct the self-celebrating fanaticism of their respective communities by their vitriolic attacks on individual moral standards and the introduction of an Ubermensch [“Overman”] as a glorious model of human virtues. Therefore, second, this work will demonstrate how Nietzsche’s Ubermensch can offer a fitting paradigm to consider Proctor’s rebellion against the established Church. And third, Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence is used to further illuminate Proctor’s view of life. Keywords: Arthur Miller; The Crucible; Friedrich Nietzsche; Ubermensch / Overman; Christianity; eternal recurrence
“普罗克托如是说”:阿瑟·米勒《坩埚》中的尼采与超人
本文通过尼采式的批判来分析阿瑟·米勒的《坩埚》(1953)。事实上,米勒的戏剧呈现了一个主角,他的个性和他与社区的互动,在神学和政治方面,需要对所有价值观进行重新评估,就像弗里德里希·尼采在19世纪欧洲所做的那样。为了探索两者之间可能的联系,首先,尼采关于基督教的观点与普罗克托在剧中对宗教的处理进行了比较。尼采和米勒都通过对个人道德标准的尖刻攻击,以及将超人作为人类美德的光辉典范的引入,解构了他们各自社区中自我庆祝的狂热。因此,第二,这部作品将展示尼采的超人如何能够提供一个合适的范例来考虑普罗克托对既定教会的反叛。第三,用尼采的永恒轮回的概念来进一步阐释普罗克托的人生观。关键词:阿瑟·米勒;坩埚;弗里德里希·尼采;超人/超人;基督教;永恒的复发
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信