Codifying Commonsense: Religious Viewpoint Antidiscrimination Acts and the Free Speech Rights They Protect

B. Riches
{"title":"Codifying Commonsense: Religious Viewpoint Antidiscrimination Acts and the Free Speech Rights They Protect","authors":"B. Riches","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2560141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court has held that the freedom of speech is not shed at the schoolhouse doors and warrants protection. Students’ whose religious viewpoints are discriminated against at school are likely unaware of their constitutional rights. The Religious Viewpoints Antidiscrimination Act or Student Religious Liberties Act, passed in Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas, aims to protect students’ right to free speech. The Acts reaffirm constitutionally protected rights to free speech in classroom assignments, homework, and other interactions while at school. The Acts also advocate for the establishment of a limited public forum at all school-sponsored events where students may speak. This policy ensures that students can speak at any school-sponsored event without the fear of discrimination or retribution. The Acts pass scrutiny under both the Lemon test and the endorsement test and protect the school from most Establishment Clause violations. The Acts promote a policy that protects students’ free speech rights, including any religious expressions and provide teachers and administrators with a clear policy that will prevent costly litigation.","PeriodicalId":114187,"journal":{"name":"Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2560141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Supreme Court has held that the freedom of speech is not shed at the schoolhouse doors and warrants protection. Students’ whose religious viewpoints are discriminated against at school are likely unaware of their constitutional rights. The Religious Viewpoints Antidiscrimination Act or Student Religious Liberties Act, passed in Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas, aims to protect students’ right to free speech. The Acts reaffirm constitutionally protected rights to free speech in classroom assignments, homework, and other interactions while at school. The Acts also advocate for the establishment of a limited public forum at all school-sponsored events where students may speak. This policy ensures that students can speak at any school-sponsored event without the fear of discrimination or retribution. The Acts pass scrutiny under both the Lemon test and the endorsement test and protect the school from most Establishment Clause violations. The Acts promote a policy that protects students’ free speech rights, including any religious expressions and provide teachers and administrators with a clear policy that will prevent costly litigation.
编纂常识:宗教观点、反歧视法案及其保护的言论自由权利
最高法院认为,言论自由不应局限于学校门口,应得到保护。宗教观点在学校受到歧视的学生很可能不知道自己的宪法权利。田纳西州、密西西比州、南卡罗来纳州和德克萨斯州通过了《宗教观点反歧视法》或《学生宗教自由法》,旨在保护学生的言论自由权利。这些法案重申了受宪法保护的在课堂作业、家庭作业和在校期间其他互动中的言论自由权利。这些法案还主张在所有学校主办的活动中建立一个有限的公共论坛,学生可以在那里发言。这项政策确保学生可以在任何学校主办的活动上发言,而不必担心受到歧视或报复。这些法案通过了莱蒙测试和背书测试的审查,并保护学校免受大多数违反政教分离条款的行为。这些法案促进了一项政策,保护学生的言论自由权,包括任何宗教表达,并为教师和行政人员提供了一项明确的政策,以防止代价高昂的诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信