Hands on Skills of NPCCs in Critical Care: Views from NPCCs, Healthcare Professionals and Other Stakeholders

Chandni B
{"title":"Hands on Skills of NPCCs in Critical Care: Views from NPCCs, Healthcare Professionals and Other Stakeholders","authors":"Chandni B","doi":"10.23880/nhij-16000264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: As demand for nurse practitioners in all types of intensive care units continues to increase; ensuring successful integration of these nurses into general and specialty intensive care units poses several challenges. Adding nurse practitioners in critical care requires strategic planning to define critical aspects of the care delivery model, acceptability and autonomy before the practitioners are hired or utilized. Autonomy can be achieved when NPs’ ability to deliver care independently is encouraged, they are well accepted in critical care units by the health care professionals and other stakeholders and when NPCC perceive they are viewed and Treated by administrators as integral members of the care teams. Multiple quantitative studies revealed the attributes of NPs’ practice autonomy and roles. However, researcher has not come across any study to assess the critical care skills performed by Nurse Practitioner in critical Care (NPCC) in India. Methodology: A quantitative descriptive research approach was used to conduct study among 35 NPCCs, 80 healthcare professionals (excluding physician) and 15 physicians through purposive sampling techniques. An expressed checklist was used to assess the critical care skills performed by NPCCs after taking formal permission from the competent authority. Results: Majority of the NPCCs (71%) had good critical care skills whereas (29%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills views from NPCCs Out of 15 physicians, majority of the subject (87%) revealed that NPCCs had good critical care skills whereas (13%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills. Majority of the health care professionals (excluding physicians) & other stakeholders (86%) said that NPCCs had good critical care skills, (14%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills. Majority of the physicians refuse to participate in the research study, only 15 physicians participated from selected institute of the research. Out of the15 physicians accept the NPCCs but found the curriculum not appropriate as per the need of the NPCCs. Conclusion: Nurse practitioners need to become more visible to both the public and other health care professionals. Continuing to educate and expose the public and other health care professionals to nurse practitioners will influence perceptions which, in turn, may increase interest in learning more about the role and affect acceptance of the role and utilization of the nurse practitioner in critical care. The utilization of NPCCs continues to have much room for expansion, allowing NPs more autonomy and involvement in the care of critical care patients, it is important for physicians and other health care providers to be familiar with the capabilities of a NPCCs in order for them to be utilized to their maximum potential","PeriodicalId":264619,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Healthcare International Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Healthcare International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/nhij-16000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As demand for nurse practitioners in all types of intensive care units continues to increase; ensuring successful integration of these nurses into general and specialty intensive care units poses several challenges. Adding nurse practitioners in critical care requires strategic planning to define critical aspects of the care delivery model, acceptability and autonomy before the practitioners are hired or utilized. Autonomy can be achieved when NPs’ ability to deliver care independently is encouraged, they are well accepted in critical care units by the health care professionals and other stakeholders and when NPCC perceive they are viewed and Treated by administrators as integral members of the care teams. Multiple quantitative studies revealed the attributes of NPs’ practice autonomy and roles. However, researcher has not come across any study to assess the critical care skills performed by Nurse Practitioner in critical Care (NPCC) in India. Methodology: A quantitative descriptive research approach was used to conduct study among 35 NPCCs, 80 healthcare professionals (excluding physician) and 15 physicians through purposive sampling techniques. An expressed checklist was used to assess the critical care skills performed by NPCCs after taking formal permission from the competent authority. Results: Majority of the NPCCs (71%) had good critical care skills whereas (29%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills views from NPCCs Out of 15 physicians, majority of the subject (87%) revealed that NPCCs had good critical care skills whereas (13%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills. Majority of the health care professionals (excluding physicians) & other stakeholders (86%) said that NPCCs had good critical care skills, (14%) had average critical care skills. None of the NPCCs had poor critical care skills. Majority of the physicians refuse to participate in the research study, only 15 physicians participated from selected institute of the research. Out of the15 physicians accept the NPCCs but found the curriculum not appropriate as per the need of the NPCCs. Conclusion: Nurse practitioners need to become more visible to both the public and other health care professionals. Continuing to educate and expose the public and other health care professionals to nurse practitioners will influence perceptions which, in turn, may increase interest in learning more about the role and affect acceptance of the role and utilization of the nurse practitioner in critical care. The utilization of NPCCs continues to have much room for expansion, allowing NPs more autonomy and involvement in the care of critical care patients, it is important for physicians and other health care providers to be familiar with the capabilities of a NPCCs in order for them to be utilized to their maximum potential
在重症监护中亲身实践npc的技能:npc、医疗专业人员和其他利益相关者的观点
导读:随着各类重症监护病房对执业护士的需求不断增加;确保这些护士成功地融入普通和专科重症监护室提出了几个挑战。在重症护理中增加护士从业人员需要在雇用或利用从业人员之前进行战略规划,以确定护理交付模式的关键方面,可接受性和自主性。当鼓励NPs独立提供护理的能力时,当NPCC认为他们被管理人员视为护理团队不可或缺的成员时,他们在重症监护病房被卫生保健专业人员和其他利益相关者广泛接受时,自主权可以实现。多项定量研究揭示了执业医师的执业自主性和角色属性。然而,研究人员还没有遇到任何研究来评估由护士执业在重症监护(NPCC)在印度执行的重症监护技能。方法:采用定量描述性研究方法,通过有目的抽样技术,对35家农村基层医院、80名医疗专业人员(不含医师)和15名医生进行研究。在获得主管部门的正式许可后,采用了一份明确的检查表来评估npc所执行的重症监护技能。结果:绝大多数(71%)具有良好的重症监护技能,而(29%)具有一般的重症监护技能。在15名医生中,大多数(87%)的被调查者认为专科医生的重症监护技能较好,而(13%)的专科医生认为专科医生的重症监护技能一般。所有npc的重症监护技能都不差。大多数卫生保健专业人员(不包括医生)和其他利益相关者(86%)表示npc具有良好的重症监护技能,(14%)具有平均的重症监护技能。所有npc的重症监护技能都不差。大多数医生拒绝参加研究研究,只有15名医生参加了选定的研究所的研究。有15名医生接受了全国人大的培训,但发现课程不适合全国人大的需要。结论:执业护士需要在公众和其他卫生保健专业人员面前变得更加可见。继续教育和向公众和其他卫生保健专业人员介绍护士从业人员将影响人们的看法,进而可能增加人们对护士从业人员的兴趣,并影响人们对护士从业人员在重症监护中的作用和利用的接受程度。npc的利用仍有很大的扩展空间,允许npc更多的自主权和参与重症监护患者的护理,对于医生和其他卫生保健提供者来说,熟悉npc的能力是很重要的,以便最大限度地利用它们的潜力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信