Coptic Burial Wrapping

J. Elias
{"title":"Coptic Burial Wrapping","authors":"J. Elias","doi":"10.1163/9789004396906_013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Bandages of fine linen cloth, smeared over with gum”—how frequent is the refrain and how quintessentially Egyptian. However, the Herodotean account of Egyptian embalming (The Persian Wars Book II, 86) is quoted so often as to almost disguise its own significance. Of the three embalming standards Herodotus addresses, only his “most perfect” one includes wrapping as part of the service. Furthermore, Herodotus leaves us with the distinct impression that wrapping is as basic as evisceration and embalming to really approaching the “manner” of Osiris and that only by providing a decent wrapping job will one have a shot at practical preservation and ritual conquest of oblivion.1 To the extent that this properly represents an ongoing ancient Egyptian tradition and not just one current around 440 BCE, what effect would such ideas have on funerary wrapping in the Christian era and at Naga ed-Deir in particular?2 In speaking about Christian funerary behavior, there is a tendency to refer to earlier traditions as “pagan” as if there had been a clean break with all ancient rites once monotheism was adopted. The notion of a “clean break” associated with new religious sensibilities is misleading and in view of the difficulty in recognizing the practices of “Early Christianity” archaeologically inside Egypt, it will be preferable to discuss wrapping methods at Naga ed-Deir in a stylistic or methodological way, and simply say “Coptic Egyptian” when referring to wrapped bodies prepared under the Byzantine hegemony.3 In view of the complex array of wrapping methods, there is clearly a need to understand","PeriodicalId":337898,"journal":{"name":"The Phoebe A. Hearst Expedition to Naga ed-Deir, Cemeteries N 2000 and N 2500","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Phoebe A. Hearst Expedition to Naga ed-Deir, Cemeteries N 2000 and N 2500","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396906_013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Bandages of fine linen cloth, smeared over with gum”—how frequent is the refrain and how quintessentially Egyptian. However, the Herodotean account of Egyptian embalming (The Persian Wars Book II, 86) is quoted so often as to almost disguise its own significance. Of the three embalming standards Herodotus addresses, only his “most perfect” one includes wrapping as part of the service. Furthermore, Herodotus leaves us with the distinct impression that wrapping is as basic as evisceration and embalming to really approaching the “manner” of Osiris and that only by providing a decent wrapping job will one have a shot at practical preservation and ritual conquest of oblivion.1 To the extent that this properly represents an ongoing ancient Egyptian tradition and not just one current around 440 BCE, what effect would such ideas have on funerary wrapping in the Christian era and at Naga ed-Deir in particular?2 In speaking about Christian funerary behavior, there is a tendency to refer to earlier traditions as “pagan” as if there had been a clean break with all ancient rites once monotheism was adopted. The notion of a “clean break” associated with new religious sensibilities is misleading and in view of the difficulty in recognizing the practices of “Early Christianity” archaeologically inside Egypt, it will be preferable to discuss wrapping methods at Naga ed-Deir in a stylistic or methodological way, and simply say “Coptic Egyptian” when referring to wrapped bodies prepared under the Byzantine hegemony.3 In view of the complex array of wrapping methods, there is clearly a need to understand
科普特裹尸布
“用细亚麻布裹上绷带,涂上口香糖”——重复出现的频率有多高,又是多么典型的埃及风格。然而,希罗多德对埃及人防腐的描述(波斯战争书II, 86)被频繁引用,以至于几乎掩盖了它本身的意义。在希罗多德提到的三种防腐标准中,只有“最完美”的一种将包装作为服务的一部分。此外,希罗多德给我们留下了一个明显的印象,那就是包装就像内脏和防腐一样基本,真正接近奥西里斯的“方式”,只有提供一个体面的包装工作,一个人才有机会实际保存和仪式上征服遗忘从某种程度上说,这恰当地代表了一种正在进行的古埃及传统,而不仅仅是公元前440年左右的一种流行,那么这种想法对基督教时代的葬礼包装,特别是在纳加埃德代尔(Naga ed-Deir),会产生什么影响?在谈到基督教的丧葬行为时,人们倾向于把早期的传统称为“异教”,仿佛一旦一神论被接受,就与所有古老的仪式彻底决裂了。与新的宗教敏感性相关的“彻底决口”的概念是误导的,鉴于在埃及境内考古学上很难认识到“早期基督教”的做法,最好以风格或方法的方式讨论Naga ed-Deir的包装方法,并在提到拜占庭霸权下准备的包裹尸体时简单地说“科普特埃及人”鉴于数组的复杂包装方法,显然有必要了解一下
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信