M. Şeker
{"title":"The Research of Acquisition Levels of Concepts Regarding Social Studies Lesson: A Quantitative Research","authors":"M. Şeker","doi":"10.15345/IOJES.2014.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article History: Received 20.01.2014 Received in revised form 22.02.2014 Accepted 10.03.2014 Available online 21.04.2014 In the 2005 Social Studies Programme, it was identified in which classes the concepts will be taught in the programme in steps of introduction, development and reinforcement.The concepts in this regard were subject to classification according to thelevels, interest, desire and needs of students. This research aims to identify the level of acquisition by school boys and girls of the concepts of introduction, development and reinforcement levels in the Social Studies the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th grades. In this study, in which a descriptive method was used, the existing situation and conditions were researched as the year. It can be said that the success rates of the levels of acquisition as a result of concept teaching in the levels of the 4th and the 5th grade sare in sufficient at the level of following the lower class (The 4th grade) and the upper class level (the 5th grade) in the stage of “Introduction and Development” of the 4th and the 5th grades. Looking into the distribution of the concepts given the 6th and the 7th grades at the level of “introduction, development and reinforcement”, both in the 6th as well as in the 7th grades, most of the concepts given were seen to be “reinforcement” level concepts. Grades concepts, the “gender” variable of students are not influential and it can be added that the levels of success/failure achieved/suffered are independent of the effect of “gender” factor. In this regard, the fact that the acquisition states of social studies concepts of the 4th Grade students are higher compared to those of the 5th grade, and the states of the 6th grade students in comparison to those of the 7th grades clearly suggest that education/teaching studies regarding the same concepts for two consecutive years are inadequate. Among the reasons for these insufficiencies, we can state that educational-training activities are not conducted or supported enough with suitable methods, techniques and strategies. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":358961,"journal":{"name":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.01.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
社会学课程概念习得水平的定量研究
在2005年的社会研究课程中,确定了哪些课程将以引入、发展和强化的步骤教授这些概念。这方面的概念根据学生的水平、兴趣、愿望和需求进行分类。本研究旨在探讨社会学科四、五、六、七年级男生和女生对引入、发展和强化概念的习得水平。在本研究中,采用描述性的方法,以年度为研究对象,考察其现状和条件。可以说,在四、五年级的“入门与发展”阶段,四、五年级的概念教学所带来的习得水平的成功率在跟随下班(四年级)和上班(五年级)的水平上是足够的。观察六年级和七年级在“引入、发展和强化”层面上给出的概念分布,无论是在六年级还是在七年级,给出的大多数概念都被视为“强化”层面的概念。成绩概念,学生的“性别”变量没有影响,可以补充说,成功/失败/遭受的水平是独立于“性别”因素的影响。在这方面,四年级学生的社会研究概念习得状态高于五年级学生,六年级学生的社会研究概念习得状态高于七年级学生,这一事实清楚地表明,连续两年对相同概念的教育/教学研究是不足的。在这些不足的原因中,我们可以说,教育培训活动没有得到适当的方法、技术和战略的开展或支持。©2014 iojes。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。