Traditional and Technology-Enhanced Learning: Faculty Perspectives and Student Experiences and Satisfaction of the Art and Design Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic

C. M. Boehm
{"title":"Traditional and Technology-Enhanced Learning: Faculty Perspectives and Student Experiences and Satisfaction of the Art and Design Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"C. M. Boehm","doi":"10.20944/preprints202111.0156.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital skills are essential in today’s digital age, which means that students must gain technology-enhanced skills from higher education for their future careers. Studies in Art & Design (A&D) programs in this university surveyed three faculties’ perspectives and nineteen students’ experiences. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this university changed its teaching and learning strategies by offering courses online during autumn 2020 and spring 2021 during mandatory quarantine. However, the A&D program was not entirely based online. As a result, it is important to take a closer look at the A&D programs offered in order to assess the faculties’ perspectives and students’ experiences during the two online semesters. The study included online surveys from instructors’ perspectives and with regard to students’ experiences about the quality of studio learning, traditional studio learning opportunities, and online studio learning opportunities via either live (on-campus) or online studios. Using relationship-based research design, posttest data surveys were collected to ascertain the differences in the mean scores, standard deviations, and percentages of some forms of agreement between the faculties’ perspectives and students’ experiences of the quality of studio learning, traditional studio learning opportunities, and online studio learning opportunities in these Art & Design (A&D) programs. This quantitative research aimed to develop formative assessments and suggestions while establishing whether it would be possible to hold all A&D courses online in a higher education setting.","PeriodicalId":148042,"journal":{"name":"Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202111.0156.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Digital skills are essential in today’s digital age, which means that students must gain technology-enhanced skills from higher education for their future careers. Studies in Art & Design (A&D) programs in this university surveyed three faculties’ perspectives and nineteen students’ experiences. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this university changed its teaching and learning strategies by offering courses online during autumn 2020 and spring 2021 during mandatory quarantine. However, the A&D program was not entirely based online. As a result, it is important to take a closer look at the A&D programs offered in order to assess the faculties’ perspectives and students’ experiences during the two online semesters. The study included online surveys from instructors’ perspectives and with regard to students’ experiences about the quality of studio learning, traditional studio learning opportunities, and online studio learning opportunities via either live (on-campus) or online studios. Using relationship-based research design, posttest data surveys were collected to ascertain the differences in the mean scores, standard deviations, and percentages of some forms of agreement between the faculties’ perspectives and students’ experiences of the quality of studio learning, traditional studio learning opportunities, and online studio learning opportunities in these Art & Design (A&D) programs. This quantitative research aimed to develop formative assessments and suggestions while establishing whether it would be possible to hold all A&D courses online in a higher education setting.
传统和技术增强学习:在COVID-19大流行期间,教师的观点和学生的经验以及艺术与设计项目的满意度
在当今的数字时代,数字技能是必不可少的,这意味着学生必须从高等教育中获得技术增强的技能,以适应未来的职业生涯。这所大学的艺术与设计研究(A&D)项目调查了三位教师的观点和19名学生的经历。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,该校改变了教学策略,在强制隔离期间(2020年秋季和2021年春季)开设了在线课程。然而,A&D项目并不完全基于在线。因此,为了评估教师的观点和学生在两个在线学期中的经历,仔细研究A&D课程是很重要的。该研究包括从教师的角度进行的在线调查,以及学生对通过现场(校园)或在线工作室进行的工作室学习质量、传统工作室学习机会和在线工作室学习机会的体验。采用基于关系的研究设计,收集了测试后的数据调查,以确定在这些艺术与设计(A&D)课程中,教师的观点与学生对工作室学习质量、传统工作室学习机会和在线工作室学习机会的体验之间的平均得分、标准差和某些形式的一致百分比的差异。这项定量研究旨在制定形成性评估和建议,同时确定是否有可能在高等教育环境中在线举办所有A&D课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信