Problematical issues of mediation conducted by a barrister during reconciliation within criminal proceedings

A. Kovalchuk
{"title":"Problematical issues of mediation conducted by a barrister during reconciliation within criminal proceedings","authors":"A. Kovalchuk","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/197-205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that one of the hallmarks of restorative justice is the use of mediation as an effective way of resolving the dispute. The above mentioned process proved to be quite popular in the practice of domestic lawyers, which in its turn became the basis for ambiguous practice and the need for the legislator's attention. That is why motive changes are taking place in Ukraine with the purpose of legislative consolidation of the institute. However, due to the lack of detailed legislative regulation of the basic provisions of regulation of mediation, namely - the status of mediator, regulatory secrecy of non-disclosure of client secrets, bodies of quality control of the provided services, etc., there is a possibility of abuse of the mentioned institute in the territory of Ukraine.\n\nThe purpose of the article is to identify the issues that may arise in the case of the combination of lawyer and mediator roles within a single proceeding.\n\nBased on the analysis of the legal framework of domestic and international legislation, it is necessary to outline the following problems.\n\nIt is argued that, to date, a major reason for the lack of active use of mediator services is the list of reasons which include both low level of public awareness and lack of legislative basis. That is why there is no proper attention to the problem of abuse of mediator status.\nIt is concluded that the conduct of mediation by a barrister within one proceeding gives grounds for the risk of violation of the basic principles of mediation, namely – confidentiality and independence. These statements are based on the definition of difference of the professions in their nature and purposes.\nIt is noted that a problematic issue is the fact that the lawyer-client relationship is governed by a contract for the provision of lawyer services, unlike the other party to the negotiations. This fact leads to a number of opportunities for abuse of the status of mediator and the exercise of fraudulent advocacy.\nIt is stated the existence of a legal conflict in case of completion of the mediation procedure without result in the form of reconciliation between the suspect and the victim. It is also outlined the possibility of manipulation of the information provided by the parties in the case of a change in the role of the barrister.\nIt has been determined that due to the retreat of the regulatory regulation of the mediation activity by the lawyer, there are no control bodies that could point out the quality of the lawyer's rendering of the above services.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of criminal justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/197-205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well known that one of the hallmarks of restorative justice is the use of mediation as an effective way of resolving the dispute. The above mentioned process proved to be quite popular in the practice of domestic lawyers, which in its turn became the basis for ambiguous practice and the need for the legislator's attention. That is why motive changes are taking place in Ukraine with the purpose of legislative consolidation of the institute. However, due to the lack of detailed legislative regulation of the basic provisions of regulation of mediation, namely - the status of mediator, regulatory secrecy of non-disclosure of client secrets, bodies of quality control of the provided services, etc., there is a possibility of abuse of the mentioned institute in the territory of Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to identify the issues that may arise in the case of the combination of lawyer and mediator roles within a single proceeding. Based on the analysis of the legal framework of domestic and international legislation, it is necessary to outline the following problems. It is argued that, to date, a major reason for the lack of active use of mediator services is the list of reasons which include both low level of public awareness and lack of legislative basis. That is why there is no proper attention to the problem of abuse of mediator status. It is concluded that the conduct of mediation by a barrister within one proceeding gives grounds for the risk of violation of the basic principles of mediation, namely – confidentiality and independence. These statements are based on the definition of difference of the professions in their nature and purposes. It is noted that a problematic issue is the fact that the lawyer-client relationship is governed by a contract for the provision of lawyer services, unlike the other party to the negotiations. This fact leads to a number of opportunities for abuse of the status of mediator and the exercise of fraudulent advocacy. It is stated the existence of a legal conflict in case of completion of the mediation procedure without result in the form of reconciliation between the suspect and the victim. It is also outlined the possibility of manipulation of the information provided by the parties in the case of a change in the role of the barrister. It has been determined that due to the retreat of the regulatory regulation of the mediation activity by the lawyer, there are no control bodies that could point out the quality of the lawyer's rendering of the above services.
在刑事诉讼和解过程中由律师进行调解的有问题的问题
众所周知,恢复性司法的特点之一是利用调解作为解决争端的有效方法。事实证明,上述过程在国内律师的实践中相当普遍,这反过来又成为模糊实践的基础和立法者需要注意的问题。这就是为什么乌克兰正在发生动机变化,目的是在立法上巩固该研究所。然而,由于缺乏对调解监管基本条款的详细立法规定,即调解员的地位、不披露客户秘密的监管保密、所提供服务的质量控制机构等,在乌克兰境内存在滥用上述机构的可能性。本文的目的是确定在单一诉讼中律师和调解员角色组合的情况下可能出现的问题。在分析国内外立法法律框架的基础上,有必要概述以下问题。有人认为,迄今为止,缺乏积极利用调解员服务的一个主要原因是一系列原因,其中包括公众意识水平低和缺乏立法依据。这就是为什么没有对滥用调解员地位的问题给予适当的重视。结论是,大律师在一个诉讼程序中进行调解有可能违反调解的基本原则,即保密和独立。这些陈述是基于对职业性质和目的差异的定义。有人指出,一个有问题的问题是,与谈判的另一方不同,律师-委托人关系受提供律师服务合同的支配。这一事实导致滥用调解人地位和进行欺诈性辩护的一些机会。有人指出,如果调解程序完成而没有导致嫌疑人和受害者之间的和解,则存在法律冲突。它还概述了在大律师角色发生变化的情况下,当事人提供的信息被操纵的可能性。经确定,由于对律师调解活动的监管退让,没有监管机构可以指出律师提供上述服务的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信