Понятие «мирового порядка»: теории и реальность

Борис Иванович Нефедов
{"title":"Понятие «мирового порядка»: теории и реальность","authors":"Борис Иванович Нефедов","doi":"10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, there is no common perception in modern science and international political practice of what the world (international) order (legal order) is. The article analyzes the relevant points of view. It is concluded that by referring to the relevant provisions, generally accepted in the framework of the general theory of law and the theory of international law, it is possible to get close enough to the solution of this problem. The article also examines other problems related to the essence of the concepts of the world (international) order and its types (world public order, world legal order and global world legal order), and also the varieties of social norms of the international regulatory system, the results of the implementation of which shape the corresponding orders. Special attention is paid to the fact that, in contrast to the widespread perceptions, all three types of world order are neither a set of international relations, nor a set of norms regulating such relations. According to the theory of international law, they are the result of the implementation of the requirements of certain norms of the international regulatory system aimed at managing international public relations. In addition, various factors influence the state of a particular type of international order (including a change in the hierarchy of states depending on their role in the international political and/or economic system, the formation of new centers of power, a change in bipolarity, polycentricity or monocentricity of the world, the emergence of multilateral integration formations, the activities of international multilateral institutions, etc.), but they should also not be confused with international orders themselves.","PeriodicalId":339296,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Politics Russia","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Politics Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, there is no common perception in modern science and international political practice of what the world (international) order (legal order) is. The article analyzes the relevant points of view. It is concluded that by referring to the relevant provisions, generally accepted in the framework of the general theory of law and the theory of international law, it is possible to get close enough to the solution of this problem. The article also examines other problems related to the essence of the concepts of the world (international) order and its types (world public order, world legal order and global world legal order), and also the varieties of social norms of the international regulatory system, the results of the implementation of which shape the corresponding orders. Special attention is paid to the fact that, in contrast to the widespread perceptions, all three types of world order are neither a set of international relations, nor a set of norms regulating such relations. According to the theory of international law, they are the result of the implementation of the requirements of certain norms of the international regulatory system aimed at managing international public relations. In addition, various factors influence the state of a particular type of international order (including a change in the hierarchy of states depending on their role in the international political and/or economic system, the formation of new centers of power, a change in bipolarity, polycentricity or monocentricity of the world, the emergence of multilateral integration formations, the activities of international multilateral institutions, etc.), but they should also not be confused with international orders themselves.
“世界秩序”的概念:理论和现实
目前,在现代科学和国际政治实践中,对于什么是世界(国际)秩序(法律秩序)还没有一个共同的认识。本文对相关观点进行了分析。本文认为,参考一般法学理论和国际法理论框架内普遍接受的有关规定,有可能足够接近这一问题的解决。本文还考察了与世界(国际)秩序及其类型(世界公共秩序、世界法律秩序和全球世界法律秩序)概念的本质相关的其他问题,以及国际监管体系的各种社会规范,这些规范的实施结果塑造了相应的秩序。特别注意的是,与普遍的看法相反,所有三种类型的世界秩序既不是一套国际关系,也不是一套调节这种关系的准则。根据国际法理论,它们是执行旨在管理国际公共关系的国际监管体系中某些规范要求的结果。此外,各种因素影响特定类型国际秩序的状态(包括国家等级的变化,这取决于它们在国际政治和/或经济体系中的作用,新的权力中心的形成,世界两极、多中心或单中心的变化,多边一体化形成的出现,国际多边机构的活动等)。但它们也不应与国际秩序本身相混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信