Nationally Released Tef Variety Adaptation Trial in North Western Tigray, North Ethiopia, 2018

{"title":"Nationally Released Tef Variety Adaptation Trial in North Western Tigray, North\nEthiopia, 2018","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jahr.02.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays tef is becoming the most preferred crop both for consumption and market value. However, its production and\nproductivity is still very low due to traditional agronomic practices, nutrient deficiencies, and lack of improved varities\nand susceptibility of the crop to lodging. So, the current trial was carried out during 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons in\nMedebay zana district at onstation with twenty eight nationally released tef varieties including standard and local check were\nevaluated with the objective of selecting adaptable and best performing tef variety/ies. Alpha lattice experimental design with\nthree replications was used on plot size of 2mx2m [1]. The data recorded were days to 50% heading and 75% physiological\nmaturity plant height, panicle length, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index. The data was analyzed using Genestat\nsoftware and means were separated using Duncan mulple range test (DMRT). The combined two years data analysis showed\nthat varieties varied significantly for most studied traits at (P<0.01 and (P<0.05). Based on the obtained result, two\nimproved tef varieties namely; Niguse shown to be high yielder variety followed by the varieties Tesfa and Guduru with\nthe values of 1880.0, 1769.0 and 1692.0 kg ha-1, respectively, greater than 20% yield increment than local variety . The\nvarieties Guduru, Wollenkomi and Magna were found to be having high biomass with the values of 9599.0, 9166.0 and 9139.0\nkg ha-1, respectively. So, Niguse was superior in almost all the agronomic traits evaluated while the local variety of Abat tef\nand was out performed by most of the improved varieties of teff tested. Therefore, based on objectively measured traits,\nthe variety Niguse was found most promising having the potential to increase the average yield of tef in Medebay zana\ndistrict and is therefore recommended for general cultivation through demonstration and pre extension popularization\nactivity as alternative tef variety for production at the testing and similar sites.","PeriodicalId":290736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Horticulture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jahr.02.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nowadays tef is becoming the most preferred crop both for consumption and market value. However, its production and productivity is still very low due to traditional agronomic practices, nutrient deficiencies, and lack of improved varities and susceptibility of the crop to lodging. So, the current trial was carried out during 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons in Medebay zana district at onstation with twenty eight nationally released tef varieties including standard and local check were evaluated with the objective of selecting adaptable and best performing tef variety/ies. Alpha lattice experimental design with three replications was used on plot size of 2mx2m [1]. The data recorded were days to 50% heading and 75% physiological maturity plant height, panicle length, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index. The data was analyzed using Genestat software and means were separated using Duncan mulple range test (DMRT). The combined two years data analysis showed that varieties varied significantly for most studied traits at (P<0.01 and (P<0.05). Based on the obtained result, two improved tef varieties namely; Niguse shown to be high yielder variety followed by the varieties Tesfa and Guduru with the values of 1880.0, 1769.0 and 1692.0 kg ha-1, respectively, greater than 20% yield increment than local variety . The varieties Guduru, Wollenkomi and Magna were found to be having high biomass with the values of 9599.0, 9166.0 and 9139.0 kg ha-1, respectively. So, Niguse was superior in almost all the agronomic traits evaluated while the local variety of Abat tef and was out performed by most of the improved varieties of teff tested. Therefore, based on objectively measured traits, the variety Niguse was found most promising having the potential to increase the average yield of tef in Medebay zana district and is therefore recommended for general cultivation through demonstration and pre extension popularization activity as alternative tef variety for production at the testing and similar sites.
2018年在埃塞俄比亚提格雷西北部国家发布Tef品种适应试验
如今,tef正成为消费和市场价值最受欢迎的作物。然而,由于传统的农艺做法、营养缺乏、缺乏改良品种和作物对倒伏的易感性,其产量和生产力仍然很低。因此,本试验于2017年和2018年种植季在medebay zana地区的站点进行,对28个国家发布的tef品种进行了评估,包括标准和地方检查,目的是选择适应性和表现最佳的tef品种。试验采用3个重复的α晶格试验设计,样块面积为2mx2m[1]。记录的数据为抽穗期至50%和生理成熟期的75%株高、穗长、籽粒产量、生物量产量和收获指数。数据采用Genestatsoftware进行分析,均数采用Duncan多元极差检验(DMRT)进行分离。2年综合数据分析表明,品种间大部分性状差异极显著(P<0.01)和(P<0.05)。在此基础上,选择了两个改良品种:;高产品种为尼古斯,其次为特丝法和古都鲁,分别为1880.0、1769.0和1692.0 kg ha-1,比地方品种增产20%以上。Guduru、Wollenkomi和Magna的生物量最高,分别为9599.0、9166.0和9139.0kg ha-1。因此,尼古斯在几乎所有的农艺性状评价中都表现优异,而阿巴特tefand则在多数改良品种中表现不佳。因此,根据客观测量的性状,发现Niguse品种最有希望提高Medebay zanana地区tef的平均产量,因此建议通过示范和推广前推广活动作为替代tef品种在试验和类似地点进行一般栽培。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信