COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY IN THE DISCIPLINE WOMEN’S SINGLES BETWEEN BULGARIAN AND FOREIGN BADMINTON PLAYERS

Rumyana Ivanova
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY IN THE DISCIPLINE WOMEN’S SINGLES BETWEEN BULGARIAN AND FOREIGN BADMINTON PLAYERS","authors":"Rumyana Ivanova","doi":"10.37393/icass2022/26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study aims to investigate the performance in the discipline Women’s Singles among Bulgarian and foreign badminton players. Thirty matches - semi-finals and finals of international tournaments and state championships in badminton in 2020 and 2021 were studied. The contingent of the study was 5 Bulgarian elite badminton players training at Badminton Club “Aneta Yaneva NSA”. In addition, the playing efficiency of 10 foreign badminton athletes in the top 10 of the World Ranking List for 2020 - 2021 was studied for reference and comparison. Using the author’s methodology, 15 game indicators (strokes) were separated into three groups: attacking, defensive, and neutral, as well as the technical elements: service, meeting, and the realization efficiency of each individual indicator are derived. The mathematical-statistical methods of variation and alternative analysis are applied to process the obtained data. The results show a statistically significant difference in the game efficiency of the attacking type of shots (77% for the world elite badminton players compared to 35% for the Bulgarian players); defensive, respectively 7% of won plays by the foreign players compared to 46% by the Bulgarian badminton players; in the case of the neutral type of shots there were no significant differences in the two groups studied.","PeriodicalId":143321,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding book Vol.1","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding book Vol.1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37393/icass2022/26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study aims to investigate the performance in the discipline Women’s Singles among Bulgarian and foreign badminton players. Thirty matches - semi-finals and finals of international tournaments and state championships in badminton in 2020 and 2021 were studied. The contingent of the study was 5 Bulgarian elite badminton players training at Badminton Club “Aneta Yaneva NSA”. In addition, the playing efficiency of 10 foreign badminton athletes in the top 10 of the World Ranking List for 2020 - 2021 was studied for reference and comparison. Using the author’s methodology, 15 game indicators (strokes) were separated into three groups: attacking, defensive, and neutral, as well as the technical elements: service, meeting, and the realization efficiency of each individual indicator are derived. The mathematical-statistical methods of variation and alternative analysis are applied to process the obtained data. The results show a statistically significant difference in the game efficiency of the attacking type of shots (77% for the world elite badminton players compared to 35% for the Bulgarian players); defensive, respectively 7% of won plays by the foreign players compared to 46% by the Bulgarian badminton players; in the case of the neutral type of shots there were no significant differences in the two groups studied.
保加利亚和外国羽毛球运动员单打成绩效率的比较
摘要本研究旨在调查保加利亚和外国羽毛球运动员在女子单打项目中的表现。研究了2020年和2021年羽毛球国际锦标赛和国家锦标赛的30场比赛——半决赛和决赛。研究小组为5名保加利亚羽毛球精英运动员,在“Aneta Yaneva NSA”羽毛球俱乐部进行训练。此外,对2020 - 2021年世界排名前10位的10名外国羽毛球运动员的打球效率进行了研究,以供参考和比较。运用作者的方法,将15项比赛指标(击球)分为进攻、防守、中性三组,并推导出技术要素:发球、接球,并推导出每个指标的实现效率。应用变分和替代分析的数理统计方法对所得数据进行处理。结果显示,在进攻类型击球的比赛效率上存在统计学上的显著差异(世界优秀羽毛球运动员为77%,保加利亚运动员为35%);防守方面,外国羽毛球运动员的胜率分别为7%,保加利亚羽毛球运动员为46%;在中性类型注射的情况下,两组研究没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信