Validation of a Method to Assess the Clinical Impact of Electronic Knowledge Resources

R. Grad, P. Pluye, M. Beauchamp, James Hanley, B. Marlow, M. Shulha, Janique Johnson‐Lafleur, A. Macaulay, Kimiz Dalkir
{"title":"Validation of a Method to Assess the Clinical Impact of Electronic Knowledge Resources","authors":"R. Grad, P. Pluye, M. Beauchamp, James Hanley, B. Marlow, M. Shulha, Janique Johnson‐Lafleur, A. Macaulay, Kimiz Dalkir","doi":"10.2979/ESJ.2007.5.2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We previously developed a method to assess the clinical impact of electronic knowledge resources. This method has potential to advance e-health research by serving as a new outcome measure in the domain of clinical decision support or computer mediated communication. In this article, we outline how such a method can be validated. The validation includes a longitudinal field research study using a mixed methods approach. Doctors will use our method to complete a computerized impact assessment questionnaire for items of information they retrieve. This will reveal cognitive impacts and application of information in practice. Subsequently, doctors will be interviewed on their most recent information searches using log-stimulated recall. Archives and observations complement interviews. These analyses serve to validate the method for assessing the clinical impact of electronic knowledge resources.","PeriodicalId":133558,"journal":{"name":"e-Service Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Service Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/ESJ.2007.5.2.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We previously developed a method to assess the clinical impact of electronic knowledge resources. This method has potential to advance e-health research by serving as a new outcome measure in the domain of clinical decision support or computer mediated communication. In this article, we outline how such a method can be validated. The validation includes a longitudinal field research study using a mixed methods approach. Doctors will use our method to complete a computerized impact assessment questionnaire for items of information they retrieve. This will reveal cognitive impacts and application of information in practice. Subsequently, doctors will be interviewed on their most recent information searches using log-stimulated recall. Archives and observations complement interviews. These analyses serve to validate the method for assessing the clinical impact of electronic knowledge resources.
电子知识资源临床影响评估方法的验证
我们之前开发了一种方法来评估电子知识资源的临床影响。该方法作为临床决策支持或计算机中介通信领域的一种新的结果衡量标准,具有推进电子卫生研究的潜力。在本文中,我们概述了如何验证这样的方法。验证包括使用混合方法的纵向实地研究。医生将使用我们的方法完成一份计算机化的影响评估问卷,对他们检索到的信息进行评估。这将揭示认知影响和信息在实践中的应用。随后,医生将接受采访,询问他们最近使用日志刺激记忆法搜索的信息。档案和观察是采访的补充。这些分析有助于验证评估电子知识资源临床影响的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信