Modes of Engagement: Problematizing Managerial Assumptions of Participation in Public Sector Digital Transformation: Problematizing managerial assumptions of participation in public sector digital transformation

Mäjt Wik, Daniel Curto-Millet, Tomas Lindroth
{"title":"Modes of Engagement: Problematizing Managerial Assumptions of Participation in Public Sector Digital Transformation: Problematizing managerial assumptions of participation in public sector digital transformation","authors":"Mäjt Wik, Daniel Curto-Millet, Tomas Lindroth","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sweden is transitioning from a provider-centric model of healthcare to a person-centric one through a large digital transformation initiative. Leading this transformation are local councils charged with co-creating with patients, citizens, and communities new digital systems. Previous literature has identified the difficulty of both large-scale change and implementing meaningful participatory processes. In this paper, we use Arnstein's model of citizen participation to analyze the degree of delegated decision-making found in managerial discourses and assumptions on this digital transformation. By comparing them with official documents, we find multiple tensions that preemptively undermine the potential active role that patients can play. Building on Arnstein's ladder of participation, we develop a framework that introduces four different modes of engagement for patient involvement in digital transformation initiatives. We suggest that beyond the design of participatory processes, digital transformations that rely on participation should focus on fostering social practices that disrupt established epistemologies.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweden is transitioning from a provider-centric model of healthcare to a person-centric one through a large digital transformation initiative. Leading this transformation are local councils charged with co-creating with patients, citizens, and communities new digital systems. Previous literature has identified the difficulty of both large-scale change and implementing meaningful participatory processes. In this paper, we use Arnstein's model of citizen participation to analyze the degree of delegated decision-making found in managerial discourses and assumptions on this digital transformation. By comparing them with official documents, we find multiple tensions that preemptively undermine the potential active role that patients can play. Building on Arnstein's ladder of participation, we develop a framework that introduces four different modes of engagement for patient involvement in digital transformation initiatives. We suggest that beyond the design of participatory processes, digital transformations that rely on participation should focus on fostering social practices that disrupt established epistemologies.
参与模式:对参与公共部门数字化转型的管理假设提出质疑:对参与公共部门数字化转型的管理假设提出质疑
瑞典正在通过一项大型数字化转型计划,从以提供者为中心的医疗保健模式转变为以人为中心的模式。引领这一转变的是地方议会,他们负责与患者、公民和社区共同创建新的数字系统。以前的文献已经确定了大规模变革和实施有意义的参与性进程的困难。在本文中,我们使用阿恩斯坦的公民参与模型来分析在数字化转型的管理话语和假设中发现的委托决策的程度。通过将它们与官方文件进行比较,我们发现了多重紧张关系,这些紧张关系先发制人地破坏了患者可以发挥的潜在积极作用。在Arnstein的参与阶梯的基础上,我们开发了一个框架,为患者参与数字化转型计划引入了四种不同的参与模式。我们建议,除了参与性过程的设计之外,依赖于参与的数字化转型应侧重于促进破坏既定认识论的社会实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信