An empirical study of competitiveness and international economic growth: The case study of the EU

M. Mariš
{"title":"An empirical study of competitiveness and international economic growth: The case study of the EU","authors":"M. Mariš","doi":"10.15414/meraa.2022.08.02.74-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper's general topic considers national competitiveness, a factor suppressing the competitiveness and economic growth of the EU member states, including the UK. The paper's main objective is to investigate possible causal links between economic growth and competitiveness with an exclusive focus on factors which disadvantage national competitiveness. As a primary source of data, results compiled within the Global competitiveness report (GCR 2017-2018) and provided by the World economic forum (WEF) have been used. The national competitiveness of each member state was expressed by its unique Global competitiveness index (GCI) elaborated according to the GCR methodology. Part of the report was an exclusive business opinion survey about general business and entrepreneurial conditions in each state. Firstly, the probability distribution of each random variable was established. As most problematic factors were highlighted taxes and tax regulations, inefficient state bureaucracy and restrictive labor conditions. Subsequently, the relations between the national competitiveness (GCI), factor score, and economic growth were analyzed. The results point to a relatively weak link between the GCI vs factor score and GCI vs economic growth, which was statistically insignificant. However, there was a moderately strong negative correlation between the factor score and economic growth, suggesting a higher factor score means lower economic growth and vice versa. There is a number of EU member states, including 'old' member states afflicted by slow economic growth. Also, these states have a higher factor score. Conversely, there are states, mostly 'new' ones, which are less developed, however, were able to achieve higher economic growth rates. In turn, their factor score is lower. Based on the results, the possible causal relationship between the economic growth and factors suppressing the business cannot be ruled out. The position of each EU member state is mainly a consequence of its own social-economic policy framework design and implementation.","PeriodicalId":356304,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics in Education, Research and Applications","volume":"368 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics in Education, Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/meraa.2022.08.02.74-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper's general topic considers national competitiveness, a factor suppressing the competitiveness and economic growth of the EU member states, including the UK. The paper's main objective is to investigate possible causal links between economic growth and competitiveness with an exclusive focus on factors which disadvantage national competitiveness. As a primary source of data, results compiled within the Global competitiveness report (GCR 2017-2018) and provided by the World economic forum (WEF) have been used. The national competitiveness of each member state was expressed by its unique Global competitiveness index (GCI) elaborated according to the GCR methodology. Part of the report was an exclusive business opinion survey about general business and entrepreneurial conditions in each state. Firstly, the probability distribution of each random variable was established. As most problematic factors were highlighted taxes and tax regulations, inefficient state bureaucracy and restrictive labor conditions. Subsequently, the relations between the national competitiveness (GCI), factor score, and economic growth were analyzed. The results point to a relatively weak link between the GCI vs factor score and GCI vs economic growth, which was statistically insignificant. However, there was a moderately strong negative correlation between the factor score and economic growth, suggesting a higher factor score means lower economic growth and vice versa. There is a number of EU member states, including 'old' member states afflicted by slow economic growth. Also, these states have a higher factor score. Conversely, there are states, mostly 'new' ones, which are less developed, however, were able to achieve higher economic growth rates. In turn, their factor score is lower. Based on the results, the possible causal relationship between the economic growth and factors suppressing the business cannot be ruled out. The position of each EU member state is mainly a consequence of its own social-economic policy framework design and implementation.
竞争力与国际经济增长的实证研究:以欧盟为例
本文的总体主题考虑了国家竞争力,这是一个抑制包括英国在内的欧盟成员国竞争力和经济增长的因素。本文的主要目的是调查经济增长和竞争力之间可能的因果关系,并专门关注不利于国家竞争力的因素。作为数据的主要来源,本文使用了世界经济论坛(WEF)提供的《全球竞争力报告》(GCR 2017-2018)中的结果。每个成员国的国家竞争力通过其独特的全球竞争力指数(GCI)来表达,GCI是根据GCR方法制定的。报告的一部分是对每个州的一般商业和创业条件的独家商业意见调查。首先,建立各随机变量的概率分布。问题的主要原因是税收和税收规定、效率低下的国家官僚主义和限制性的劳动条件。随后,分析了国家竞争力、要素得分与经济增长之间的关系。结果表明,GCI与因素得分和GCI与经济增长之间的联系相对较弱,在统计上不显著。然而,因子得分与经济增长之间存在较强的负相关关系,表明因子得分越高意味着经济增长越低,反之亦然。有许多欧盟成员国,包括那些经济增长缓慢的“老”成员国。此外,这些州的因子得分更高。相反,有些国家,大多是“新”国家,虽然不太发达,但却能够实现更高的经济增长率。反过来,他们的因素得分更低。根据研究结果,不能排除经济增长与企业抑制因素之间可能存在的因果关系。每个欧盟成员国的立场主要是其自身社会经济政策框架设计和实施的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信