SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF CONFINED ADOBE MASONRY STRUCTURES

Muhammad Ejaz Ahmad, F. Khan, N. Ahmad
{"title":"SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF CONFINED ADOBE MASONRY STRUCTURES","authors":"Muhammad Ejaz Ahmad, F. Khan, N. Ahmad","doi":"10.35453/nedjr-stmech-2020-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents shake-table tests which were performed on two 1:3 reduce-scaled adobe masonry models confined with vertical and horizontal bands. The model AM1 consisted of bands (tie beam) at sill, lintel and eave levels, and lightly reinforced concrete (RC) columns at the corners. The model AM2 was similar to AM1 except that RC columns at the corners were not provided in this model. The models were subjected to sinusoidal base motions for studying their seismic performance. The lateral force-deformation capacity curves for both the models were developed and were bi-linearized to compute the response parameters including stiffness, strength, ductility and response modification factor (R). Seismic performance levels of both the models were defined and their seismic performance assessment was carried out to evaluate their suitability in different seismic zones. The use of vertical columns in the AM1 model considerably increased its lateral strength as compared to the AM2 model. Although R factor of 2.0 has been recommended for both the models, seismic performance of the AM1 model was found better in all seismic zones due to high lateral strength of this model.","PeriodicalId":259216,"journal":{"name":"NED University Journal of Research","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NED University Journal of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35453/nedjr-stmech-2020-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents shake-table tests which were performed on two 1:3 reduce-scaled adobe masonry models confined with vertical and horizontal bands. The model AM1 consisted of bands (tie beam) at sill, lintel and eave levels, and lightly reinforced concrete (RC) columns at the corners. The model AM2 was similar to AM1 except that RC columns at the corners were not provided in this model. The models were subjected to sinusoidal base motions for studying their seismic performance. The lateral force-deformation capacity curves for both the models were developed and were bi-linearized to compute the response parameters including stiffness, strength, ductility and response modification factor (R). Seismic performance levels of both the models were defined and their seismic performance assessment was carried out to evaluate their suitability in different seismic zones. The use of vertical columns in the AM1 model considerably increased its lateral strength as compared to the AM2 model. Although R factor of 2.0 has been recommended for both the models, seismic performance of the AM1 model was found better in all seismic zones due to high lateral strength of this model.
约束土坯砌体结构抗震性能评价
本文介绍了两个1:3缩小比例的土坯砌体模型的振动台试验,并对竖向和水平带进行了约束。模型AM1由在门槛、门楣和屋檐水平的带(系梁)和在角落的轻钢筋混凝土(RC)柱组成。AM2模型与AM1模型相似,只是该模型没有在拐角处提供RC柱。为了研究模型的抗震性能,对模型进行了正弦基底运动。建立了两种模型的侧向力-变形能力曲线,并对其进行了双线性化,计算了包括刚度、强度、延性和响应修正系数(R)在内的响应参数。定义了两种模型的抗震性能等级,并对其进行了抗震性能评价,以评价其在不同地震带的适用性。与AM2模型相比,AM1模型中垂直柱的使用大大增加了其横向强度。虽然建议两种模型的R因子均为2.0,但由于AM1模型具有较高的侧向强度,因此在各震区的抗震性能都较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信